The Biden Presidency
- Thread starter The Tariff King
- Start date
I don't know the answer to this but there certainly should be. We were also told that we had full recounts in GA which was obviously bunk because all they did was compare count sheets to the reported totals.
Favorito's evidence was pretty clear cut. He just used what was publicly available.
Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
Isn't one of the biggest problems we face as a nation the fact that "fair and balanced" as well as "actual truth" doesn't exist anymore? I realize the Dems only want to hear what they want to hear, but have you forgotten the 5 years of Trump (on the campaign trail as well as when he was president)? Every single thing he did that was wrong or just plain stupid was "fake news" or a "Liberal hoax" and every single person who ever accused him of anything, or criticized him for anything, or any whistle blower who pointed out the "insane crap" that went on under his "leadership" was fake news, or a hoax, or a lie, or the person was a great guy/girl until they did or said something he didn't like, then they were a traitor and shouldn't be believed? Do you remember how he even turned on Fox News and send Bill Barr to Fox News HQ to ask them why they weren't "delivering" for him anymore?
How is any person who even tries to be fair minded and open minded supposed to forget or ignore all that stuff???
Again, auditing is a science.
This is not a partisian spin on anything. Analytics/walkthroughs are done to risk assess and scope in relevant areas. Controls are inspected to determine the level of substantive testing to be performed. Subtantive testing is performed. Conclusions are then drawn.
This is how every audit for any company is done. Whether you are AIG or some mom and pop looking for audited statements for a loan. This cannot be faked.
Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
Sure it can be faked. How many laws (I mean the good ones) are just not enforced by those who are supposed to do it? I understand what you're saying, you should be able to verify and check and cross check serial numbers and other data but what it comes down to IMO is "who's watching the watchers"? Any system is only as good as the people using or verifying it.
The work can be reviewed by anyone who thinks its fake.
Here is a spoiler alert - The left will not dare try to challenge the validity of the results. They will focus on the people who performed the audit because they know the findings will stand up to any challenge.
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
A former O-5 breaks down the results of a recent Navy survey on leadership.
https://cdrsalamander.substack.com/...mpaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=twitter
One recent destroyer captain lamented that, “where someone puts their time shows what their priorities are. And we've got so many messages about X, Y, Z appreciation month, or sexual assault prevention, or you name it. We don't even have close to that same level of emphasis on actual warfighting.”
From the US Navy's official YouTube page, look at the topics of the videos the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Gilday, USN, has put out in the last year.
He sets the tone. He sets the priorities. Check them out yourself. I don't need to say more.
Frustration with nonessential training was found to be overwhelming and not limited to the surface warfare community. Navy leaders have contributed to morass of requirements, but so have senior civilian defense leadership and Congress. While programs to encourage diversity, human sex trafficking prevention, suicide prevention, sexual assault prevention, and others are appropriate, they come with a cost. The non-combat curricula consume Navy resources, clog inboxes, create administrative quagmires, and monopolize precious training time. By weighing down sailors with non-combat related training and administrative burdens, both Congress and Navy leaders risk sending them into battle less prepared and less focused than their opponents.
This is part of the administrative burden. You only have finite training time. Priorities derived from incentives and disincentives will drive decisions throughout the chain of command.
“Sometimes I think we care more about whether we have enough diversity officers than if we’ll survive a fight with the Chinese navy,” lamented one lieutenant currently on active duty. “It’s criminal. They think my only value is as a black woman. But you cut our ship open with a missile and we’ll all bleed the same color.”
...
A recently retired senior enlisted leader suggested that this dynamic was more a lack of proper prioritization. “I guarantee you every unit in the Navy is up to speed on their diversity training. I’m sorry that I can’t say the same of their ship handling training.”
https://cdrsalamander.substack.com/...mpaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=twitter
One recent destroyer captain lamented that, “where someone puts their time shows what their priorities are. And we've got so many messages about X, Y, Z appreciation month, or sexual assault prevention, or you name it. We don't even have close to that same level of emphasis on actual warfighting.”
From the US Navy's official YouTube page, look at the topics of the videos the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Gilday, USN, has put out in the last year.
He sets the tone. He sets the priorities. Check them out yourself. I don't need to say more.
Frustration with nonessential training was found to be overwhelming and not limited to the surface warfare community. Navy leaders have contributed to morass of requirements, but so have senior civilian defense leadership and Congress. While programs to encourage diversity, human sex trafficking prevention, suicide prevention, sexual assault prevention, and others are appropriate, they come with a cost. The non-combat curricula consume Navy resources, clog inboxes, create administrative quagmires, and monopolize precious training time. By weighing down sailors with non-combat related training and administrative burdens, both Congress and Navy leaders risk sending them into battle less prepared and less focused than their opponents.
This is part of the administrative burden. You only have finite training time. Priorities derived from incentives and disincentives will drive decisions throughout the chain of command.
“Sometimes I think we care more about whether we have enough diversity officers than if we’ll survive a fight with the Chinese navy,” lamented one lieutenant currently on active duty. “It’s criminal. They think my only value is as a black woman. But you cut our ship open with a missile and we’ll all bleed the same color.”
...
A recently retired senior enlisted leader suggested that this dynamic was more a lack of proper prioritization. “I guarantee you every unit in the Navy is up to speed on their diversity training. I’m sorry that I can’t say the same of their ship handling training.”
Last edited:
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
She clearly suffers from toxic whiteness.
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
They think of the military as a jobs program. Equity and justice in government jobs are far more important to them than efficiency. They can just print more money or blame whitey for any problems.
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
hahaha
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
lol
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
lol
McCann'sCans
Gwinnett Bound
https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-b...on-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/
Just jumping back in here briefly to avoid more DMs before enjoying more time away from this board. As usual, seems to be a lot of yelling at clouds going on. It does seem like some ballots were double-counted in the initial count that would have cost Trump about 125 votes- those issues were rectified in the initial recount.
"Digital ballot images made public under Georgia’s new voting law show nearly 200 ballots — including one for West — that election officials initially scanned two times last fall before a recount. There’s no indication any vote for president was counted more than once in official results."
I love that the conspirators can't decide if Fulton is woefully incompetent or if they are so competent they pulled off the biggest fraud in history. I tend to agree with the former, but both things can't be true. Love the quote in this article from Carter Jones: “It’s Fulton failing to follow proper election protocols again,” said Carter Jones, an independent monitor of Fulton’s elections who found sloppy practices but no fraud. “Fulton is so poor at managing the actual process that if they had actually tried to rig the election, they would have bungled it and we would have found out.”
Just jumping back in here briefly to avoid more DMs before enjoying more time away from this board. As usual, seems to be a lot of yelling at clouds going on. It does seem like some ballots were double-counted in the initial count that would have cost Trump about 125 votes- those issues were rectified in the initial recount.
"Digital ballot images made public under Georgia’s new voting law show nearly 200 ballots — including one for West — that election officials initially scanned two times last fall before a recount. There’s no indication any vote for president was counted more than once in official results."
I love that the conspirators can't decide if Fulton is woefully incompetent or if they are so competent they pulled off the biggest fraud in history. I tend to agree with the former, but both things can't be true. Love the quote in this article from Carter Jones: “It’s Fulton failing to follow proper election protocols again,” said Carter Jones, an independent monitor of Fulton’s elections who found sloppy practices but no fraud. “Fulton is so poor at managing the actual process that if they had actually tried to rig the election, they would have bungled it and we would have found out.”
We are there to "**** **** UP".
Just standard incompetence I'm sure. The AJC has really played this straight up. There is no indication because nobody is bothering to actually inspect the election process in GA with a real audit.
Lets completely ignored the falsified talley sheets as well. Ho Hum.