The Biden Presidency
- Thread starter The Tariff King
- Start date
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I see no where in the constitution where is specifically days people cant protest outside justices houses. That's mocking their logic for their decision btw, since I know you need this stuff explained to you. I wonder how much you want a law banning things meant to influence or intimidate a judge to be enforced.
Also, would you now agree with me that we need some way to hold people accountable to the law if the DA or prosecutor with jurisdiction refuses?
Also, would you now agree with me that we need some way to hold people accountable to the law if the DA or prosecutor with jurisdiction refuses?
sturg33
I
Lol can you point me to the constitution about fire bombing abortion clinics?
For a brazen idiot you talk a lot of **** or maybe that's just something a brazen idiot would do.
According to 18 U.S. Code § 1507: "Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."
I'm willing to bet you don't know why this statute was put in. Look it up.
Wray said he didn't have the spare personnel to take care of it. lol
Last edited:
Man, the crap this guy can come up with. lol
sturg33
I
I've never seen such a cuck for the police in my lifetime
Until they interfere with his drug use. Then he plays the victim card.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Yes I can. That part about property. What I do see in the constitution is a first amendment right to protest government.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
For a jackass you sure think other people need your approval, for whatever reason.
You are citing law not the constitution which does grant the ability for us to tell government what we think of them. If you think they are breaking an law that's fine
Theres lots of people I dont think the law is enforced on. Tough titties. If it was up to me there would be a mechanism for private citizens to prosecute when the local DA refuses. How you take that and get your panties in a bunch I dont know.
sturg33
I
Wait your saying destroying property is a constitutional right?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
........
sturg33
I
Despite the very fierce competition I do not think there is a dumber person on this board than Goldy
It was a Fed issue and Wray gave a weak excuse why he didn't enforce the law. I never said anything about approval so I don't know where that came from.
Regardless of all the mumbo jumbo you've put on here trying to sidetrack what I said the fact is that the DOJ/FBI ignored it.
Last edited:
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Why would the FBI and DoJ be involved in the first place. Its a local police issue.
And since you need it explained to you, I dont need your approval, which you clearly think I do with your endless attempts to insult me. If I wanted to, I could have you thinking I was the smartest mother****er to walk this Earth. Thats an exaggeration by the way. I know better than to assume you have the most basic levels of reading comprehension.
And since you need it explained to you, I dont need your approval, which you clearly think I do with your endless attempts to insult me. If I wanted to, I could have you thinking I was the smartest mother****er to walk this Earth. Thats an exaggeration by the way. I know better than to assume you have the most basic levels of reading comprehension.
Last edited:
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
So if prosecutors on the case think they have enough evidence to charge and convict the only reasonable assumption if the prosecutors boss tells them to drop it is corruption? Right?
It's not a local issue. It's a federal statute, you dip****. If what you said was true Wray would have said that as an excuse. It's the same reason the FBI has been involved in the arrest of people at the abortion clinics, not the locals.
Last edited:
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
DC is all federal. Who do they call when someone breaking into their house? Who do they call when someone robs a bank? The FBI and DoJ dont do the day to day policing in DC. You arent going to get any sympathy from me about selective enforcement of the law by a DA or prosecutor. You would be preaching to the choir on that issue. Selective law enforcement is wrong but I want a solution for everyone not just when your team is affected by it. Little known fact, local prosecutors are the most powerful people in America.
*sigh* That's not how it works. It was the FBI and DOJ jurisdiction's because a federal statute, 18 U.S. Code § 1507, was broken. Take the L and move on.
"The residential picketing appears to run afoul of a 1950 federal law — Title 18, Section 1507, of the U.S. Code — that makes it illegal to picket or parade outside a jurist’s home “with the intent of influencing any judge.” Violations are punishable by a fine and up to a year in prison."
I'm going to keep saying this until you get it through your thick head that this is a federal law. That's why the FBI was involved in the arresting of abortion protestors in Tennessee because they are accused of breaking the FACE Act, which is a federal statute.
"So, what is the Biden administration doing about it? This is a federal statute, so it’s Attorney General Merrick Garland’s responsibility to enforce it."
https://www.aei.org/op-eds/protesting-at-justices-homes-is-illegal-what-is-biden-doing-about-it/
Last edited: