skin in the game may help some aspects of it.
Don’t take this as me caring about the plight of the blue checkmark holders, but I don’t agree with you on this. Having skin in the game really just turns into a question of whether or not you want to spend money for the honor of a checkmark, not anything to do with the content you post once you do. If I were to have any concern with the practice, it’s that for a while there will be fake news running rampant due to the trust associated with a verified account. It’s not a universal thing, but there are certainly segments who will be more trusting of a verified account than an unverified account.
You don't believe this is happening already?
What do you mean how are these alive?
Who the hell are you to tell anyone what to believe?
It’s on the individual reader to validate what they’re reading.
I’m not telling anybody what to believe. But even if major publications get it wrong, there’s certainly a difference between journalists researching a news story and some guy posting his fever dreams about lizard people in a Wordpress blog. The latter calling himself an independent journalist and having a blue check is likely to increase his reach if people don’t think about it enough.
DHS leaks are kind of a big deal.
Musk sitting on the real dirt.
It is simply amazing to me that the seals on this board will post hundreds of times about DOCUMENTS but remain completely silent on this
Word is $20 a month to keep your blue check mark on twitter
Pay for Verified is gonna be funny. I can't wait for the 10 Elon Musk twitter accounts to be verified.