cajunrevenge
Well-known member
You're still avoiding the question. There are plenty of people here who read just as many reports and blurbs you do. Sickels isn't some hidden treasure trove of information - I routinely read everything he put out too (until he lost funding for his site). He differed from the usual suspects at times, but he was wrong at least as often as Law, the guys at BA, and the guys at Pipeline are - and a lot of those times it was because he was trying to be different than them, not because he had legitimate reasons. He constantly admitted that he ranked people higher than other sites at times because he "had a feeling" about this guy or that guy - not because of anything he could measure.
We're all "right" about the occasional prospect when others weren't every once in a while - the difference is you want someone to pat you on the back for that but don't want anyone to mention when your "system" fails.
If matching wits with Bill Shanks is something you feel is worth crowing about, more power to you.
I answered your question in the first sentence of the post where I quoted you. I watched quite a few minor league games through minorleaguebaseball.com in 2018 and 2019 but I will admit I am not good at the eye test. I am not good at differentiating between the pitches, analyzing batting or pitching mechanics. I dont know what the purpose of your statements on Sickels come from. I said he was a personal favorite of mine. I take a lot of input from a lot of sources and form my own opinion. I dont know why you needed to go into all that about Sickels. He was a favorite because he was particularly well connected and informed on Braves Prospects. If I remember correctly he used to cover the Braves farm system for Baseball America. Every prospecter has their blind spots and biases. It wasnt intended to say he was the Nostradamus of prospecting. I care far more about the quality of information they provided than their rankings and Sickels was a great source for Braves prospect information.
Thank you for informing me that everyone gets it right every once in a while. I had not considered this. I really dont understand how you type that and dont think your are insulting a person. There are people here I think are smart and people I think are dumb, not a single one of them do I think needs it to be explained to them that anyone that makes predictions is bound to be right every now and then. I am not looking for a pat on the back I am looking to not get attacked for just having a different opinion. People can disagree without attacking me or my methodology. I feel like I have gone out of my way to say in my posts that I have been wrong plenty of times. Its just frustrating to go through this EVERYTIME I have an unpopular opinion. Every. Single Time. You all disagree. I got it. I have no problem with being mocked if I am wrong. I have a problem being mocked before we even know the results. Then even if I am right the next time around its the same ****. I dont pick a lot of these hills to die on. Rarely will you see me speak in such absolutes like I do about Melvin or did about Cody Johnson back in the day because theres always the potential for development.
As for Shanks, I dont see how thats a battle of wits with Shanks and not a battle of wit vs the rest of everyone else who tried to guess it. I am not sure how I am supposed to react to people attacking my competency other than point out the many times I was right, or atleast more right than everyone else. The only other way is to wait for the results but those will be ignored anyways.