striker42
Well-known member
Yeah, celebrating the deaths of others is pretty low behavior. Some don't realize it's possible to disagree with someone and even believe they've caused harm without thinking they deserve death.
The Coronavirus, not the beer
- Thread starter Runnin
- Start date
Yeah, celebrating the deaths of others is pretty low behavior. Some don't realize it's possible to disagree with someone and even believe they've caused harm without thinking they deserve death.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
Just want to say I 100% support his right to suicide by covid.
I just hope that in pursuing this right he didn't pass on any of the associated costs to the rest of society.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Antibody treatments work. BUT there is the catch of needing the supply of the treatment.It certainly works, but it also is tricky because it's usually only given to people at high risk.
Tapate50
Well-known member
Not really the case at all. One of my good friends just got one. He's probably in better shape than I am with no underlying issues.
He said he made an appt and was in the next day. He wasn't overly sick, but thats what they are pushing in Fla. Felt better the next day and two days later felt MUCH better.
acesfull86
Well-known member
https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-coronavirus-breakthrough-vaccine-natural-immunity-cdc-fauci-biden-failure-11631548306?mod=opinion_lead_pos5
Sound data from the CDC has been especially lacking on natural immunity from prior Covid infection. On Aug. 25, Israel published the most powerful and scientifically rigorous study on the subject to date. In a sample of more than 700,000 people, natural immunity was 27 times more effective than vaccinated immunity in preventing symptomatic infections.
Despite this evidence, U.S. public health officials continue to dismiss natural immunity, insisting that those who have recovered from Covid must still get the vaccine. Policy makers and public health leaders, and the media voices that parrot them, are inexplicably sticking to their original hypothesis that natural immunity is fleeting, even as at least 15 studies show it lasts.
Meanwhile, employers fire workers with natural immunity who won’t get vaccinated. Schools disenroll students who won’t comply.
The CDC did put out a study on natural immunity last month, forcefully concluding that vaccinated immunity was 2.3 times better than natural immunity. The CDC used these results to justify telling those with natural immunity to get vaccinated.
But the rate of infection in each group was less than 0.01%, meaning infections were exceedingly rare in the short two-month time period the agency chose to study. This is odd, given there are more than a year of data available. Moreover, despite having data on all 50 states, the CDC only reported data from Kentucky. Was Kentucky the only state that produced the desired result? Why else exclude the same data from the other 49 states?
Some public health officials are afraid to acknowledge natural immunity because they fear some will choose infection over vaccination. But leaders can encourage all Americans who aren’t immune to get vaccinated and be transparent with the data at the same time.
Sound data from the CDC has been especially lacking on natural immunity from prior Covid infection. On Aug. 25, Israel published the most powerful and scientifically rigorous study on the subject to date. In a sample of more than 700,000 people, natural immunity was 27 times more effective than vaccinated immunity in preventing symptomatic infections.
Despite this evidence, U.S. public health officials continue to dismiss natural immunity, insisting that those who have recovered from Covid must still get the vaccine. Policy makers and public health leaders, and the media voices that parrot them, are inexplicably sticking to their original hypothesis that natural immunity is fleeting, even as at least 15 studies show it lasts.
Meanwhile, employers fire workers with natural immunity who won’t get vaccinated. Schools disenroll students who won’t comply.
The CDC did put out a study on natural immunity last month, forcefully concluding that vaccinated immunity was 2.3 times better than natural immunity. The CDC used these results to justify telling those with natural immunity to get vaccinated.
But the rate of infection in each group was less than 0.01%, meaning infections were exceedingly rare in the short two-month time period the agency chose to study. This is odd, given there are more than a year of data available. Moreover, despite having data on all 50 states, the CDC only reported data from Kentucky. Was Kentucky the only state that produced the desired result? Why else exclude the same data from the other 49 states?
Some public health officials are afraid to acknowledge natural immunity because they fear some will choose infection over vaccination. But leaders can encourage all Americans who aren’t immune to get vaccinated and be transparent with the data at the same time.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
That's good. I know up here it was limited this past february, like they could count on one hand.
sturg33
I
The vaccine mandates are quite literally nothing more than a mechanism for public control.
Anyone who thinks it is about public health are willfully stupid
Tapate50
Well-known member
Desantis has opened up 25 and counting facilities treating a load of people.
They know what the science said prior to COVID.
Masks are useless and anyone arguing otherwise just isn't paying attention.
People want to be muzzled.
zbhargrove
Well-known member
Got to admit, without looking at the actual study, the article is pretty convincing.
zbhargrove
Well-known member
That's the part I'm struggling with too...