sturg33
I
[tw]1257306327769964544[/tw]
Great country we have here
If true. Tragic and hope they get the penalty they deserve.
Also, there will be more violence if lawmakers continue to enforce this.
[tw]1257306327769964544[/tw]
Great country we have here
If true. Tragic and hope they get the penalty they deserve.
Also, there will be more violence if lawmakers continue to enforce this.
Businesses have the right to enforce patrons to wear a mask. This has nothing to do with lawmakers.
If true. Tragic and hope they get the penalty they deserve.
Also, there will be more violence if lawmakers continue to enforce this.
Looks like some of the protests are making an impact
[Tw]1257374635747835904[/tw]
[tw]1257343005167665153[/tw]
This is a very odd story the Times ran. I think they are making a bit too much out of this document. It seems amateurishly put together. The graphs of the projections look odd. And there is no background information in the article about how these projections were made.
The projection line seems to start on March 15. But it says run date for the model is May 1. Doesn't add up.
Most numerical models include data well before the date they are run. Those previous numbers and trends are valuable input into the model. The more real data you can assimilate, the better the model quality. That's why real time and past observations are included in weather models.
I'm looking at the fitted line (which might be a backcast) versus the actual data (the blue dots). I'd be a little alarmed if my fitted line were entirely below what it is trying to forecast or estimate.
The fitted line is just a backcast, but this is directly from a leaked CDC presentation. So it is legit.
The fitted line is just a backcast, but this is directly from a leaked CDC presentation. So it is legit. And has one who works for a federal government agency, I can assure you most of our graphs are put together way too quickly and haphazardly to get the results out. We should really hire some Excel experts.
Every company/entity needs excel experts. Its shocking how inept most people are with the one of the most influential programs ever created.
You get the government to pony up. I have become quite the guru but its only because I cared to put in the time on my own to increase my skills.
I would be surprised if the CDC stat gurus are running their models in excel.