The Coronavirus, not the beer

Why do we suppose none of the lefty sheep have commented on lab leak discussions?

Feels like something they'd be highly interested in.

Of course, agenda >>>>>> all
 
sturg33 said:
Why do we suppose none of the lefty sheep have commented on lab leak discussions?

Feels like something they'd be highly interested in.

Of course, agenda >>>>>> all
Click to expand...

Conspiracy theories keep on becoming the reality. There is one more big one that’s about to emerge real soon and if anyone has learned anything from the CCP VIRUS it’s that you can’t trust what the majority of the media/expert class is saying.

This is why there was that article which discouraged critical thinking. When reasonable people are presented with facts most will arrive at the right conclusions.
 
nsacpi said:
Informative article on the theories of the origins of covid-19.

https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/
Click to expand...


Science is supposedly a self-correcting community of experts who constantly check each other’s work. So why didn’t other virologists point out that the Andersen group’s argument was full of absurdly large holes? Perhaps because in today’s universities speech can be very costly. Careers can be destroyed for stepping out of line. Any virologist who challenges the community’s declared view risks having his next grant application turned down by the panel of fellow virologists that advises the government grant distribution agency.

————

My favorite is the above tidbit about how the scientific community doesn’t question so they get their grant money.

Didn’t someone say that not too long ago?

Maybe you guys should stop and think that I may know what I’m talking about.
 
Any of the self proclaimed smart guys want to man up and admit I was right or will it be on to the next conspiracy theory accusation?
 
[tw]1399030259840950277[/tw]

There was once a man who called these people the enemy of the people.

I guess that man was right.

One day he will return and bring our country back to its glory.
 
thethe said:
Science is supposedly a self-correcting community of experts who constantly check each other’s work. So why didn’t other virologists point out that the Andersen group’s argument was full of absurdly large holes? Perhaps because in today’s universities speech can be very costly. Careers can be destroyed for stepping out of line. Any virologist who challenges the community’s declared view risks having his next grant application turned down by the panel of fellow virologists that advises the government grant distribution agency.

————

My favorite is the above tidbit about how the scientific community doesn’t question so they get their grant money.

Didn’t someone say that not too long ago?

Maybe you guys should stop and think that I may know what I’m talking about.
Click to expand...

You better believe that dollars and cents is what drove the outcry against HCQ as well despite over a hundred studies showing it’s effective when administered early.

Hopefully you guys will learn for the next time.
 
Next time?
Maybe next time vote for a candidate that doesn't have bankrupting a gambling casino on his resume.

As long as the conversation is who did and didn't get something right.
You might wanna sit this one out
 
thethe said:
You better believe that dollars and cents is what drove the outcry against HCQ as well despite over a hundred studies showing it’s effective when administered early.

Hopefully you guys will learn for the next time.
Click to expand...

Holy ****, you still think HCQ was some miracle? Holy hell.
 
zitothebrave said:
Holy ****, you still think HCQ was some miracle? Holy hell.
Click to expand...

Who said it was a miracle? The science shows it works an it should have been used.

This is another example of just because trump said something doesn’t mean it wasn’t true. But that didn’t stop idiots like you promoting pointless studies and suppressing actual studies designed to highlight its effectiveness. But just like the lab leak wasn’t accepted because of grant money the same can be said about HCQ. Big pharma runs science and they follow their orders.
 
57Brave said:
Next time?
Maybe next time vote for a candidate that doesn't have bankrupting a gambling casino on his resume.

As long as the conversation is who did and didn't get something right.
You might wanna sit this one out
Click to expand...

Reversion to trump as always.

If you want to indulge then those prior bankruptcies meant nothing about his ability to be president which this far has shown to be vastly superior to Obama and his three terms.
 
There we are

Coming out as anti vaccine

While also towing the line trump is why there is a vaccine for something you don’t need lol

Lol

So ****ing stupid
 
The lack of self awareness from these fools is astounding.

And yet, the mask cult will buy it in droves as their religion mandates

[tw]1399776569888063493[/tw]
 
thethe said:
Who said it was a miracle? The science shows it works an it should have been used.

This is another example of just because trump said something doesn’t mean it wasn’t true. But that didn’t stop idiots like you promoting pointless studies and suppressing actual studies designed to highlight its effectiveness. But just like the lab leak wasn’t accepted because of grant money the same can be said about HCQ. Big pharma runs science and they follow their orders.
Click to expand...

LMAO

Whatever buddy. What literally they said was listen to your doctor. Not listen to a bunch of insane right wingers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top