The Coronavirus, not the beer

Thanks for the context.

There are billions and billions of possible ways to pick out words to form a sentence. And your choice was:

"Vaccinated people are infecting vaccinated people."

It is a very curious choice to say the least.

[tw] 1423849435960860673[/tw]

Agreed. Its stupid.

I suppose they are following new yorks lead on this front as they were trashing doses a few months ago.

Stupid leaders all over. I wish our gold standard could stop leading us in wrong directions
 
Ok, well since you said so lol

Either way, I’ll be back in that ****hole in 9 days. About to head to Ohio for a few days. Getting packed up now before a nap to catch the flight
 
Ok, well since you said so lol

Either way, I’ll be back in that ****hole in 9 days. About to head to Ohio for a few days. Getting packed up now before a nap to catch the flight

We covered in this thread Cuomo throwing away doses bc he didn't want to go out of order of his list of people who got the vaccine first. Rather than use them all based on demand like DeSantis did, he threw tens of thousands of doses in the garbage.

You were, unsurprisingly, silent on the issue.
 
Cool

I was talking about your Florida comment

I really never care about any of your whataboutisms though or hang on everything that happens in this thread

I’ve been living my life.

Your scenario/reply are irrelevant to that tweet though lol
 
Cool

I was talking about your Florida comment

I really never care about any of your whataboutisms though or hang on everything that happens in this thread

I’ve been living my life.

Your scenario/reply are irrelevant to that tweet though lol

Oh. A weird tweet you posted then.

Don't worry... the northeast will have the same curve this fall. This is the same pattern as last year.

I will remind you that FL has the 26th highest death rate. Gold standard NY is #2, just behind liberal hellhole NJ
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
https://www.wsj.com/articles/vaccine-mandate-natural-immunity-lawsuit-covid-19-coronavirus-11628281507?mod=opinion_major_pos4

In a few weeks I will begin my 24th year as a law professor at George Mason University. Last year I volunteered to teach in person, even though I’m in my 50s. Teaching law is my job and I owe my students my best. I also knew I could do it safely. During the spring of 2020 I contracted and recovered from Covid-19, which I later confirmed through a positive antibody test. Multiple positive antibody tests have since confirmed that I continue to have a robust level of immune protection.

But now my employer, a state institution, is requiring Covid vaccines. In my case, vaccination is unnecessary and potentially risky. My only other options are to teach remotely or to seek a medical exemption that would require me to wear a mask, remain socially distanced from faculty or students during, say, office hours, and submit to weekly testing.

It would be impossible for me to perform my duties to the best of my ability under such conditions. The administration has threatened those who don’t submit with disciplinary action, including termination of employment. This week the public-interest lawyers at the New Civil Liberties Alliance filed suit on my behalf, challenging the university’s mandatory vaccination requirement for those with naturally acquired immunity. This coercive mandate violates my constitutional right to bodily integrity for no compelling reason.

Clinical studies from Israel, the Cleveland Clinic, England and elsewhere have demonstrated beyond a doubt that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 provides robust and durable protection against reinfection comparable to or better than that provided by the most effective vaccines. Examining the evidence this May, the World Health Organization concluded: “Current evidence points to most individuals developing strong protective immune responses following natural infection with SARS-CoV-2.”


——————

We don’t yet know how long immunity lasts from vaccination…I’m not sure we know how long immunity generally lasts after recovering from infection

These would be good things to know before mandating that someone with natural immunity get a vaccine…

What’s the cost/benefit of a vaccine look like to someone who is producing positive antibody tests after recovering from a prior infection?
 
Last edited:
The fact that natural immunity isn't even in the public conversation when it comes to public policy is telling. How much lower are Big Pharmas profits if lets say we did country wide antibody testing that captured T Cell immunity and all those that testing positive bypassed the vaccine?

Its clear whats happening.
 
https://www.wsj.com/articles/vaccine-mandate-natural-immunity-lawsuit-covid-19-coronavirus-11628281507?mod=opinion_major_pos4

In a few weeks I will begin my 24th year as a law professor at George Mason University. Last year I volunteered to teach in person, even though I’m in my 50s. Teaching law is my job and I owe my students my best. I also knew I could do it safely. During the spring of 2020 I contracted and recovered from Covid-19, which I later confirmed through a positive antibody test. Multiple positive antibody tests have since confirmed that I continue to have a robust level of immune protection.

But now my employer, a state institution, is requiring Covid vaccines. In my case, vaccination is unnecessary and potentially risky. My only other options are to teach remotely or to seek a medical exemption that would require me to wear a mask, remain socially distanced from faculty or students during, say, office hours, and submit to weekly testing.

It would be impossible for me to perform my duties to the best of my ability under such conditions. The administration has threatened those who don’t submit with disciplinary action, including termination of employment. This week the public-interest lawyers at the New Civil Liberties Alliance filed suit on my behalf, challenging the university’s mandatory vaccination requirement for those with naturally acquired immunity. This coercive mandate violates my constitutional right to bodily integrity for no compelling reason.

Clinical studies from Israel, the Cleveland Clinic, England and elsewhere have demonstrated beyond a doubt that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 provides robust and durable protection against reinfection comparable to or better than that provided by the most effective vaccines. Examining the evidence this May, the World Health Organization concluded: “Current evidence points to most individuals developing strong protective immune responses following natural infection with SARS-CoV-2.”


——————

We don’t yet know how long immunity lasts from vaccination…I’m not sure we know how long immunity generally lasts after recovering from infection

These would be good things to know before mandating that someone with natural immunity get a vaccine…

What’s the cost/benefit of a vaccine look like to someone who is producing positive antibody tests after recovering from a prior infection?

So this gentleman was so dedicated to teaching in person last year that he volunteered to do so even in the face of the risks.

And now he is willing to give up this thing that he was so dedicated to in order to avoid a harmless jab?

Sounds like there might be a little ideology behind all this.

Just a wee bit.
 
Aces' point still stands though. It's nothing but virtue signaling to require people who have already had the virus to get the demonstrably less effective vaccine. Unless you stand to profit from it, then it's just greed.
 
Last edited:
So this gentleman was so dedicated to teaching in person last year that he volunteered to do so even in the face of the risks.

And now he is willing to give up this thing that he was so dedicated to in order to avoid a harmless jab?

Sounds like there might be a little ideology behind all this.

Just a wee bit.

A person has antibodies.

You still want him fired for not taking a jab with unknown long term effects.

And you think He is the one with the ideology.

Sure, sure 57
 
Back
Top