March 14th, 1 person died from COVID-19. You legitimately think there were ~99 other people around New York who died from untested Flu that day, but just no one thought to test them for COVID?
When was a reliable test developed?
March 14th, 1 person died from COVID-19. You legitimately think there were ~99 other people around New York who died from untested Flu that day, but just no one thought to test them for COVID?
So no infections in your world got here in November? Is that what you're actually trying to say with a straight face?
How many planes came from china during that time frame?
Jesus you are being dense here but I guess it's easier to just insult when you know you're wrong.
It is certainly possible that there were specific individuals that had exposure months ago. That has nothing to do with the widespread pandemic effects currently happening.
When was a reliable test developed?
You are reading neither the articles you post nor other people's posts in this thread. Try and slow down your agitprop.
Non sequitur response. The correct answer is that there were not 99 non-lab confirmed flu deaths on March 14.
Specific individuals? So you think it stayed local. This virus spreads rapidly so as seed infections were coming into the country from November to January each of those created a new exponental spread data set.
If you are willing to admit a few individuals (which is absurd considering the amount of travel between China and the US) then your whole position makes no sense.
Was there information that all people who died from flu like symptons were tested?
Not every individual seeds at the same rate. It certainly possible that some people came over with the infection and did not spread it. It could have also spread in a fairly isolated and healthy group, none of whom were "super-spreaders." It is also possible that no one came over with it until January. Who knows? I certainly don't, and neither do you. But it has clearly been moving around at a much greater scale since February, based just on the death totals.
Is your theory that in NY 100 people a day were dying from flu-like symptoms during the COVID-19 outbreak, but no one was testing them for either the flu or COVID-19? Like, legitimately I don't see what else you could be suggesting. But that's a legit tinfoil-hat theory.
acting like the USA couldn't test while south korea has been testing out the ass
and we both had our first case on the same day
is absolute lunacy from the cult members to try to rewrite history
What would mass testing have to do with the overall number of sick people in hospitals? According to you people were getting sick and dying or being hospitalized, but just not confirmed COVID-19 cases. Yet hospitals weren't nearly as constrained with the same sort of symptoms in the sort of mass quantities we're seeing now. Certainly not dying at the same rates.
My "hunch" is you suck at math. Or you are just burying your head in the sand.
Or this is the natural progression of the curve that was forming since november? Once you reach critical mass of total number infected the spread will slow down dramatically and the curve plummets.
My guess is that you actually have no experience with math.
If you want though I can show you my undergrad in math as well as my cpa exam grades. Let me know.
Manu Raju
✔
@mkraju
Trump says in his meeting with the governors there was a “wise guy”
who “a little bit” raised his voice and used to be a “big” wise guy
but they “saw to it” that he wouldn’t be anymore