Because they share a tribe common with the progressives. It’s bad but it is what it is.Why would the media who are not doctors supress this treatment?
Because they share a tribe common with the progressives. It’s bad but it is what it is.
You read the exact same type of media but on the right. How is this any different?
It’s the nature of for profit media that they tailor their product to their consumers.
I suppose that’s true an indirect way. Rather there’s certainly a large amount of confirmation bias at play (ignore the good, focus on the bad). If you’re worried about the media not getting their fair share of blame, don’t be — they are polling by far the worst in this whole mess.They know the doctors reports. THey know the anecdotal evidence from doctors all over the world
The only reason to fight against it is because it will help Trump.
I suppose that’s true an indirect way. Rather there’s certainly a large amount of confirmation bias at play (ignore the good, focus on the bad). If you’re worried about the media not getting their fair share of blame, don’t be — they are polling by far the worst in this whole mess.
I’ll flip the question back at you. Why are you so against social distancing orders? There’s significant evidence that it’s helping, and there is a broad consensus from economists that ending the lockdown too soon will have adverse economic effects.
I'm not against social distancing at all.
I was a huge proponent of stay at home orders for March
Not my question. But to be more specific, let’s say through April since that’s the current policy.
Data doesnt support this decision anymore.
We ramped up capacity and have treatment. We know who is at risk.
For a long time now I've been pushing a go back to work for the majority of the population and have government incentive for ay risk population.
[Tw]1247150426006245378[/tw]
Morons
Treatment is anecdotally good. But not proven to be effective clinically.
Our capacity supports a bended curve.
Economic models still show the risk/reward trade off still supports a shutdown.
My point here is that if you are going to be “data driven” and cherry pick the headlines you like then you need to be consistent. You can’t anecdotally trust in Hydroxychloroquine to be a cure all and in the same time ignore the data that supports continued shutdown.
[Tw]1247219208464879616[/tw]
It's an endless comedy show.
just gonna keep remembering all of these type posts when i will continue seeing how pro life people are once we get through this