The Coronavirus, not the beer

You didn’t read even the abstract of the article you linked did you?

You didn't read any of them did you? They acknowledged firstly that they could have been a sampling and study issue.

"Third, SARS-CoV-2 lineages might evade immunity generated in response to previous infection.15 Three recently detected SARS-CoV-2 lineages (B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1), are unusually divergent and each possesses a unique constellation of mutations of potential biological importance.16, 17, 18 Of these, two are circulating in Brazil (B.1.1.7 and P.1) and one (P.1) was detected in Manaus on Jan 12, 2021.16 One case of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection has been associated with the P.1 lineage in Manaus19 that accrued ten unique spike protein mutations, including E484K and N501K.16 Moreover, the newly classified P.2 lineage (sublineage of B.1.128 that independently accrued the spike E484K mutation) has now been detected in several locations in Brazil, including Manaus.20 P.2 variants with the E484K mutation have been detected in two people who have been reinfected with SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil,21, 22 and there is in-vitro evidence that the presence of the E484K mutation reduces neutralisation by polyclonal antibodies in convalescent sera.15"

Again, Brazil has done nothing to inhibit the virus. And it's still ravaging that country. Sweden did nothing for a year aside from recommendations that people did follow but no mandates and it's still ravaging that country. There's 0 evidence that what you said would happen. Literally none and as far as I know, no epidemiologist recommends that course of action.
 
You’re straight up denying math. It’s a simple equation.

No it isn't. If it was a simple equation how come it hasn't happened in Brazil, Sweden, etc. Why are the only nations who're succeeding against this disease ones who aren't following your recommendations?
 
Hey you finally read what you posted. Thats fantastic.

If epidemiologists are not advocating it then I know I’m right.
 
Hey you finally read what you posted. Thats fantastic.

If epidemiologists are not advocating it then I know I’m right.

Hahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

Thethe, knows more about epidemics than the people who's job it is to deal with **** like this. You probably pretend to give yourself colonoscopies.
 
Government is not the answer.

The answer is pushing individual responsibility.

This survival of the fittest mentality is not only a terrible humanitarian platform, but also a terrible idea in practice that doesn't work and puts unnecessary strain on our healthcare system.

It's not shocking at all to see you supporting this viewpoint.
 
This survival of the fittest mentality is not only a terrible humanitarian platform, but also a terrible idea in practice that doesn't work and puts unnecessary strain on our healthcare system.

It's not shocking at all to see you supporting this viewpoint.

An individual either has to decide they love themselves or not. No amount of government intervention will change that.

I’m not surprised that you think government can solve everything.

How about that nursing home conspiracy eh?
 
[tw]1368962447080648712[/tw]

Could have just quarantined the whole obese without wearing one mask and we would have had a significantly better outcome.

As a society we chose fat adults over children. What a shame.

Less healthy are more susceptible to virus and diseases. What an absolutely shocking revelation.
 
Less healthy are more susceptible to virus and diseases. What an absolutely shocking revelation.

It should be shocking to you because you didn’t want to hear anything about different IFRs a year ago when I said a blended rate was pointless to look at.

Every step of the way youve been behind and now you’re going to try to make silly comments as if you’ve known all along.

Sure thing buddy.

Conspiracy theories!!!
 
An individual either has to decide they love themselves or not. No amount of government intervention will change that.

I’m not surprised that you think government can solve everything.

How about that nursing home conspiracy eh?


We know that government programs designed to curb unhealthy behavior can work. We literally have seen that with tobacco use. I'm not surprised your small brain can't comprehend that.

How about that .01% IFR? 60k deaths?
 
We know that government programs designed to curb unhealthy behavior can work. We literally have seen that with tobacco use. I'm not surprised your small brain can't comprehend that.

How about that .01% IFR? 60k deaths?

You think government intervention stopped smoking. Wow.

IFR is that amount so I’m not sure what you’re talking about. You still don’t understand serological studies do you? Shame that you still don’t get it.

But maybe you can just he’ll conspiracy theory and ever address it again.
 
It should be shocking to you because you didn’t want to hear anything about different IFRs a year ago when I said a blended rate was pointless to look at.

Every step of the way youve been behind and now you’re going to try to make silly comments as if you’ve known all along.

Sure thing buddy.

Conspiracy theories!!!


Blended IFR is pointless to look at. We're over 500k deaths and you still can't comprehend that.

Meta even made the comment as to "why do you want to genocide our elderly?" To which, you laughed off and said we wouldn't even have 100k deaths.
 
Blended IFR is pointless to look at. We're over 500k deaths and you still can't comprehend that.

Meta even made the comment as to "why do you want to genocide our elderly?" To which, you laughed off and said we wouldn't even have 100k deaths.

We already know the guidance on what is a positive test was flawed. Doubt you’ve been following up on things because well you can’t comprehend most things. So we know that we Probabaly had millions of false positives that were later coded as covid deaths.

We even had Birx early in the pandemic say that at least 25% of covid deaths are wrong.

Then the cdc said that only 6% of deaths were directly attributed to covid.

So not sure what world you live in but it’s a world of terrible ideas and flat out being wrong.

Still want to talk about the conspiracy theory of nursing home deaths or just pretend like you are ever right about anything?
 
You think government intervention stopped smoking. Wow.

IFR is that amount so I’m not sure what you’re talking about. You still don’t understand serological studies do you? Shame that you still don’t get it.

But maybe you can just he’ll conspiracy theory and ever address it again.

Government intervention 100% helped to curb smoking. That is a fact that isn't disputable.

I don't know why I bother with you.

Even if 100% of Americans had contracted the virus, the IFR would would still be over .1% you idiot.
 
Last edited:
I don't know why I bother with you.

Even if 100% of Americans had contracted the virus, the IFR would would still be over .1% you idiot.

It’s a shame that the majority of the population is as dumb as you. Read up on overcycling pcr tests and then get back to me.
 
But we should absolutely listen to the guy that said it was a conspiracy to suggest that Cuomo hid the true nursing home death figures.

THIS TIME HE IS RIGHT!
 
I seriously don't know why I keep coming back in here to argue with some who clearly has no grasp on reality.
 
Back
Top