The Don

How is hacking into John Podesta's email any different than ransacking Danial Ellsburg's psychiatrists office or the break in at Watergate ?
 
57Brave said:
from this morning NY Times:

.............

This has been the most disgusting presidential campaign in history.

But, Donald Trump has done us a great public service:

He has brought down the Bush dynasty.

He laid to rest the lie that W Bush "kept us safe."

He exposed Ted Cruz for the hypocrite he is.

He is making Paul Ryan twist in the wind, as Ryan refuses to campaign with him, but still won't withdraw his vote.

He showed us, not by design, how egregious and unfair our tax code is and how it's totally slanted towards the wealthy in this country.

He brought to the forefront the misogyny and sexism of the GOP, as well as the sexism many women have to deal with in the workplace.

He might just make the Senate go to the Democrats, something that was not even a possibility months ago.

He might cause the Republicans to rebuild their party into something similar to the party my Father was a member of for decades.

See, there is a silver lining.
Click to expand...

What did the times have to say about Wikileaks and Hillary?
 
msstate7 said:
What did the times have to say about Wikileaks and Hillary?
Click to expand...

a) you keep asking other people to make your points

b) your computer doesn't get NY Times i take it ?

c) it should be overly apparent I could care less about the Wikileaks "revelations"
unless of course I was dying to know what John Podesta likes on his pizza
 
the NY Times lawyers letter to Trump when he threatened them with suing them if they don't pull an article and apologize is ****ing brilliant
 
57Brave said:
c) it should be overly apparent I could care less about the Wikileaks "revelations"
Click to expand...

Why? Are you content with being just another low information voter?

I recognize that partisans are always going to be partisans, but this willing ignorance tact is just plain disturbing.

Hillary suggesting people "unplug the Internet" a few minutes ago ... this is her response to e-mails which reveal her campaign to have conspired against Bernie Sanders, pandered "Needy Latinos", mocked Catholics ... and lots of other nefarious strings being tied together as more information is leaked each day.

And you are OK with this? Unbridled collusion with the media? The notion that you can take one position in public and a completely separate one in private?

The Berners think is normal behavior? Threatening Bernie because his brother called Bill a rapist? Getting debate questions in advance?

I suppose it's more convenient to turn a blind eye, lets your eyes glaze over with the tabloidian distractions.
 
57Brave said:
a) you keep asking other people to make your points

b) your computer doesn't get NY Times i take it ?

c) it should be overly apparent I could care less about the Wikileaks "revelations"

unless of course I was dying to know what John Podesta likes on his pizza
Click to expand...

You mad, bro?

I've got like 4 posts in Real Talk and the only other question was if a photo was real. I don't get the hostility, but whatever
 
yeezus said:
wtf? you're a terrible human being. can you answer how in the **** someone saying "i grab women's vaginas whenever i want because i'm a celebrity" isn't advocating for, admitting to, and bragging about sexual assault? to be clear: if someone grabs a women without their consent, is it sexual assault to you, or not? i've been in plenty of locker rooms, with friends and with strangers, and never once have heard someone brag about sexual assaults they've committed.

yeah, if i heard a guy bragging about sexually assaulting someone, i'd say something to them. but i've never needed to, because i've never heard it, because normal people don't brag about sexual assault even when talking about women.

i guess i'm just not a "man" for not being cool with brags about sexual assault. and i guess i'm not a "man" for thinking it's ****ing weird to make a suggestive comment to a ten year old. and i guess i'm not a "man" because i wouldn't walk in on 15-year olds (or anyone, at any age) when i knew they were changing (including, apparently, my daughter). the defense for this stuff is disgusting. donald is a perv and i can now assume you are, too.
Click to expand...

There is a big difference in what Trump said and someone legitimately saying they sexually assaulted someone. Like I said, you don't know what locker room talk is because you've never been trusted by people enough for them to allow you to be around it. You can't handle guys saying stupid **** for the sake of saying stupid ****. You can't handle guys exaggerating just to exaggerate. You take this stuff way too literally. You'd probably have the entire building full of guys I work with fired if you overheard some of the stuff that is said around here. It's just guys being guys and entertaining each other with stupid acts of bravado. It's to be taken with a grain of salt. Lighten up dude. Not everything people say is meant to be taken in a literal sense.
 
Wikileaks has outed Hilary and the Times being in collaboration with each other and you guys are going to read the Times and trust them as a fair news source?
 
Bill Clinton might be a sack of ****, too, and Hillary like a whole other bunch of corrupt politicians. But when you have to say "well our guy might suck, but theirs is worse," there's your problem right there. The more I see and read each day, the prouder I am to not be voting for either of them.
 
goldfly said:
well, good thing no one is voting for him then i guess
Click to expand...

Yeah, I think the Trump campaign has done a pretty solid job of convincing me not to vote for Bill Clinton. Unfortunately for them, they've chosen to take an issue where many Americans would feel sympathy for the wife involved, and draws a pretty direct parallel to their own candidate's behavior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top