The Government Colluded with Twitter to Censor

Well first, they didnt break any laws, so I dont see the big deal. You dont have a right to post on twatter. Second, Trump is the most anti-free speech politician I know of in modern politics. And I do enjoy people getting their own **** thrown back at them. I believe in the free market and thats how this is going to be handled. If people dont like it they can opt out of using it and move to something else. Theres no shortage of competitors and many of them were born specifically to cater to people who are upset about these issues. And third, I am just as upset about this as you are about Russia helping Trump in 2016.

Russia helping trump

Hahahahahah

Dumber by the day
 
Observation 1: law enforcement is generally biased against those inclined to break the law

Observation 2: moderation against deza and lies will generally be biased against those who promulgate them

Corollary 1: if a political ideology comes to be associated with law breakers law enforcement will be biased against it

Corollary 2: if an ideology comes to be associated with lies and deza content moderation will be biased against it

ymmv
 
Last edited:
Observation 1: law enforcement is generally biased against those inclined to break the law

Observation 2: moderation against deza and lies will generally be biased against those who promulgate them

Corollary 1: if a political party comes to be associated with law breakers law enforcement will be biased against it

Corollary 2: if a party comes to be associated with lies and deza content moderation will be biased against it

ymmv

But I'll bite...

Which of the following are deza

- the virus likely originated from a lab

- the COVID vaccine does not stop you from getting or spreading COVID 19

- closing schools will have catastrophic consequences for child development

- lockdowns will result in unintended consequences, like shuttered businesses, alcohol abuse, missed cancer screenings, and social anxiety/depression


^ all of the above resulted in some sort of censorship on twitter... So please lecture me about which are deza
 
Maybe expose a crime?

I really don't feel like going through the same song and dance with you yet again. You're the guy who thinks no conviction equals no crime so there is no point in going forward. But for the 100th time, the government cannot collude with private businesses to suppress speech
 
Observation 1: law enforcement is generally biased against those inclined to break the law

Observation 2: moderation against deza and lies will generally be biased against those who promulgate them

Corollary 1: if a political party comes to be associated with law breakers law enforcement will be biased against it

Corollary 2: if a party comes to be associated with lies and deza content moderation will be biased against it

ymmv

Do you have an observation about willfully ignoring child porn on their platform while they focus on making sure Alex Berenson gets kicked off?
 
Observation 1: law enforcement is generally biased against those inclined to break the law

Observation 2: moderation against deza and lies will generally be biased against those who promulgate them

Corollary 1: if a political ideology comes to be associated with law breakers law enforcement will be biased against it

Corollary 2: if an ideology comes to be associated with lies and deza content moderation will be biased against it

ymmv

lol

Are you trolling us or are you really this dimwitted?
 
I really don't feel like going through the same song and dance with you yet again. You're the guy who thinks no conviction equals no crime so there is no point in going forward. But for the 100th time, the government cannot collude with private businesses to suppress speech


The government can, does, and will keep doing it. If the company is doing it willingly its not a first amendment violation. What is a first amendment violation is trying to raise rates on Amazon because their owner also owns a newspaper that prints things the President doesnt like.
 
The government can, does, and will keep doing it. If the company is doing it willingly its not a first amendment violation. What is a first amendment violation is trying to raise rates on Amazon because their owner also owns a newspaper that prints things the President doesnt like.

Or threats of an unfavorable antitrust ruling based on the president's ire....or IRS audits of his perceived enemies

Those are actual for real examples of tyranny AND oppression that the boyz are curiously silent about
 
Observation 1: law enforcement is generally biased against those inclined to break the law

Observation 2: moderation against deza and lies will generally be biased against those who promulgate them

Corollary 1: if a political ideology comes to be associated with law breakers law enforcement will be biased against it

Corollary 2: if an ideology comes to be associated with lies and deza content moderation will be biased against it

ymmv

I knew you’d get to Sam Harris eventually.
 
I’m wondering what laws were broken? Is this the fake collusion or the attempt to properly warn the American people abou the Biden crime family?
 
But I'll bite...

Which of the following are deza

- the virus likely originated from a lab

- the COVID vaccine does not stop you from getting or spreading COVID 19

- closing schools will have catastrophic consequences for child development

- lockdowns will result in unintended consequences, like shuttered businesses, alcohol abuse, missed cancer screenings, and social anxiety/depression


^ all of the above resulted in some sort of censorship on twitter... So please lecture me about which are deza

Curiously silent, indeed
 
Some of you have made the observation in a different context that the fact police statistics are skewed against a particular group is not proof of discrimination. And if an innocent from that group is caught up in the dragnet well that's too bad. Profiling is a bitch. It generally works if not perfectly. No man made policy passes the test of perfection. Of course we should always strive to do better, etc, etc.

Look at the bright side. This is a learning opportunity for how to be more empathetic human beings. All twitter did to right wingnuts is a very light-handed type of profiling.
 
Last edited:
Some of you have made the observation in a different context that the fact police statistics are skewed against a particular group is not proof of discrimination. And if an innocent from that group is caught up in the dragnet well that's too bad. Profiling is a bitch. It generally works if not perfectly. No man made policy passes the test of perfection. Of course we should always strive to do better, etc, etc.

So what are the prior events that caused the bias to be pushed?
 
But I'll bite...

Which of the following are deza

- the virus likely originated from a lab

- the COVID vaccine does not stop you from getting or spreading COVID 19

- closing schools will have catastrophic consequences for child development

- lockdowns will result in unintended consequences, like shuttered businesses, alcohol abuse, missed cancer screenings, and social anxiety/depression


^ all of the above resulted in some sort of censorship on twitter... So please lecture me about which are deza

Still curiously silent
 
Some of you have made the observation in a different context that the fact police statistics are skewed against a particular group is not proof of discrimination. And if an innocent from that group is caught up in the dragnet well that's too bad. Profiling is a bitch. It generally works if not perfectly. No man made policy passes the test of perfection. Of course we should always strive to do better, etc, etc.

Look at the bright side. This is a learning opportunity for how to be more empathetic human beings. All twitter did to right wingnuts is a very light-handed type of profiling.

lolololol
 
Back
Top