Metaphysicist
Not Actually Brian Hunter
https://www.vox.com/2020/3/11/21173437/trump-judge-neomi-rao-mueller-grand-jury-dc-circuit
Since Trump is appointing constitutional judges can someone point out the constitutional argument as to why the House oversight committee can not see the grand jury redacted information when investigating the President. The only dissenter was a Trump appointed judge.
I don't think Rao is being completely hacky here; this is pretty consistent with classic conservative "unitary executive" theory (and an extremely simplistic view of separation of powers) that long predates Trump. You have to understand that a central tenet of the Federalist Society et al. is that Congress is the most tyrannical branch, and thus the Constitution is creating a strong executive specifically to check that tyranny (this is not completely wrong; the lack of a strong executive was a core problem of the Articles of Confederation).
Of course, the idea of the "unitary executive" is not actually in the constitution, but archconservatives argue that it is implied from the structure. If that sounds suspiciously like the kind of things conservatives whine about liberals saying... well... you aren't wrong.
Anyway, her other central argument is that the McGahn decision precludes this one and the court should be consistent. Not the worst argument I've every hear from a conservative judge, but not very compelling.
ALL THAT SAID, Rao wants Ginsburg's seat if she goes; no way is she breaking with Trump when there is wiggle room to not.