sturg33
I
What more is there to say? He said a major US city being destroyed would be great for the economy. He probably isnt wrong about that.
The idea that we should destroy wealth so we can create it back is liberal logic 101.
What more is there to say? He said a major US city being destroyed would be great for the economy. He probably isnt wrong about that.
"who is Ron Paul ?" asked 2017
You seem to frequently equate popularity to good
"who is Ron Paul ?" asked 2017
The free market system of ideas.
That Politico article is hilarious. Bet Pelosi and Schumer are wondering what else they can get Trump to do just by saying he'll get positive news coverage. What a clown he is.
That Politico article is hilarious. Bet Pelosi and Schumer are wondering what else they can get Trump to do just by saying he'll get positive news coverage. What a clown he is.
Been telling my Republican peeps who fell head over heels for him since 2015 that he would screw them over as soon as it suited his interests. They're getting exactly what they deserve if they ever put that much trust in him.
He is literally the only guy who goes around ****ting on Trump but receives nothing but praise from Trump and his followers. Find me anyone else like that and I will never mention Ron Paul or Hillary Clinton on these forums ever again. He is also the only person to be well respected by the Trump Republicans and the major TV liberals like Bill Maher, Rachel Maddow, and Jon Stewart. That someone that broad of appeal is shunned by the media as having no chance is downright criminal. All of you up in arms about Russia manipulating our elections but dont give a **** when the media intentionally blacklists a major candidate. Thats far worse than anything Russia did.
If there was anything negative to cover on Ron the media would have been all over it. Maybe thats where Ron went wrong. He should have leaked an audio tape of himself calling blacks ******s. I bet that would have got some coverage. Sad thing is that would have probably got him the GOP establishments support.
Hawk you're thoughts on 5th Amendment question.
Emphasis on question
The weight I carry for Trump (and, trust me, it ain't light) is borne almost entirely because I believe that his candidacy is solid step in a direction toward where our shared views can be achieved.
Well, as you know, with everything constitutional it inevitably boils down to interpretation. I think you could make a technical case for some kind of due process violation here, absolutely. Entrapment or self-incrimination. But, suffice it to say, that water is incredibly murky, primarily because it's executive power clashing with executive power, not legislation.
More broadly, there's the whole 'shock the conscience' Frankfurter precedent, which would allow the court to act in cases of egregious abuse of executive power. I don't see that coming into play here given the ideological leanings of the court.
Edit: On that note, here's Clarence Thomas on Due Process from a few years ago:
"The [Due Process Clause] is not a secret repository of substantive guarantees against ‘unfairness.’"