The Trump Presidency

goldfly said:
i can't wait for the dumbass to tweet or say this plant was cause of him
Click to expand...

From the NYT: Union organizers fell far short on Wednesday in a bid to enlist workers at Boeing’s South Carolina facilities in what was widely viewed as an early test of labor’s strength in the Trump era.

Methinks he will.
 
i'm still trying to wrap my head around the Obama shadow gov't **** from Rush (and i'm sure others will follow)

it's laughable to listen to how much i'm told he was terrible and an ineffective leader to now be told he is running the shadow gov't that is in place while he is kite surfing
 
goldfly said:
i'm still trying to wrap my head around the Obama shadow gov't **** from Rush (and i'm sure others will follow)

it's laughable to listen to how much i'm told he was terrible and an ineffective leader to now be told he is running the shadow gov't that is in place while he is kite surfing
Click to expand...

So if you think he was good and an effective leader then that means that there is an Obama shadow government?
 
weso1 said:
So if you think he was good and an effective leader then that means that there is an Obama shadow government?
Click to expand...

well, i think he was good but could have been more effective

i without a doubt believe he isn't leading a shadow gov't

it's funny to hear people likes of Rush etc push such a dumb "theory" out there though
 
goldfly said:
so, China just allowed the Trump trademark that the orange one has been fighting for since 2006:

but i'm sure, just a coincidence again
Click to expand...

and people said Trump wasnt qualified. He has the government corruption down in less than a month. Thats impressive.
 
What if the market takes another huge step when tax reform is signed into law? I'm a happy market participant right now.
 
Jeremy Schahill is withdrawing from real time this week because Milo will be on. You'd think people who disagree with views would want to debate them so they are proven wrong....especially on a left leaning program.

He'd probably rather just silence milo with force.
 
weso1 said:
I think Occam is sharpening his blade. What theory is more simplistic? The CIA is an organized deep state entity or the CIA just simply had issues with Flynn's Russian connections and decided it was best to hold onto certain intelligence. And that led to Trump's advisors pushing to oust Flynn so that the White House could gain full intel. I think the boot fits.
Click to expand...

So am I the only one who is not okay with the CIA getting to decide if the freaking President gets access to intel?
 
Jaw said:
So am I the only one who is not okay with the CIA getting to decide if the freaking President gets access to intel?
Click to expand...

Unprecedented territory in our republic. There is a desire to overthrow all that we were built on for the sake of groupthink.
 
Went so far as to install a military man as Chief of Staff.

Intellegance and military were unsure what he would do.

Trump picked the wrong fights. Regardless of what some cracker in Idaho thinks or voted for.

Chilling thought, but, the emails
 
Jaw said:
So am I the only one who is not okay with the CIA getting to decide if the freaking President gets access to intel?
Click to expand...

I agree with you, but the CIA has been misbehaving since its inception by either withholding information or fabricating fantastical scenarios. At the same time, maybe people in high places shouldn't do stupid sh*t. The CIA's misbehavior shouldn't detract from the suspicion that surrounds the connections between Flynn, Manafort, and perhaps others and Russia.
 
Bannon, Trump's chief strategist, is also making an attempt to put to rest stories that he and Priebus are at loggerheads.He told CNN's Dana Bash Wednesday that he was "livid" with a report on Breitbart News, where he used to be the executive chairman, that suggested Priebus might soon lose his job.
"The story is totally untrue. Reince is doing a great job. I couldn't ask any more from a partner," Bannon said.
Still, a source who has talked to both Priebus and Bannon in the last week said that while Bannon had nothing negative to say about Priebus, the White House chief of staff "badmouthed" Bannon to this source over the phone.
Click to expand...

There's some irony there right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top