goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
He was asked "fake news or criminal leaks"?
Answer, paraphrased: The leaks are real. The news is fake, because it's fake.
it's beyond absurd
it's one or the other, it can't be both
He was asked "fake news or criminal leaks"?
Answer, paraphrased: The leaks are real. The news is fake, because it's fake.
He was asked "fake news or criminal leaks"?
Answer, paraphrased: The leaks are real. The news is fake, because it's fake.
it's beyond absurd
it's one or the other, it can't be both
He was asked "fake news or criminal leaks"?
Answer, paraphrased: The leaks are real. The news is fake, because it's fake.
Trump lacks eloquence, but he does have a point.
Matt Bai's latest. Makes a lot of sense. I'm no Christie fan, but there's no question he knows how to run a railroad and the Trump White House looks like amateur hour right now. Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-in-trouble-is-it-christie-time-already-100043322.html
No, he doesn't have a point
I want to get away with this type of **** in my day-to-day life.
"Did you get this work assignment done?"
"Yes, and also there is no work assignment."
him losing his job over it doesn't prove something it's fake. it proves the opposite
But you understand what he's saying, right?
He believes that the leaks were innocent in and of themselves - which may or may not be true - but that the media has chosen to characterize them most heavily from the 'Russia conspiracy' angle.
The whole "if it bleeds, it leads" thing.
Trump lacks eloquence, but he does have a point.
He's still talking. Why?