Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
And remember the one in front is Gary Johnston.
Reality starting to dawn?
“We are seeing a relatively broad-based scaling back of the exuberant optimism we saw in many markets after the election,” said Libby Cantrill, head of public policy at bond giant Pimco. “This is in part a recognition that even though there is one-party control in Washington, real divisions remain within the Republican conference. But even more so, it is the understanding that tackling health care policy and tax reform in one year is ambitious under the best of circumstances.”
The skeptics now include Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street investment bank whose alumni, including Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn, are the driving forces behind the Trump administration’s push for sweeping tax reform.
Mnuchin has repeatedly pledged to get a big tax package to Trump’s desk by the August congressional recess. And he’s celebrated the market rally as evidence of confidence in the president’s ability to improve the economy.
But Goldman recently told clients to tamp down their expectations for tax reform, and stocks sensitive to tax reform, infrastructure spending and deregulation have reversed their post-election gains. “Our economists continue to expect corporate tax cuts late this year but few major reforms to the tax code,” Goldman said a recent research note.
Lost in the shuffle here, that 98k jobs numbers report...
Lost in the shuffle here, that 98k jobs numbers report...
Yeah - surprising number because ADP reported a blowout number on Wednesday... so that disconnect is odd to me
Yeah - surprising number because ADP reported a blowout number on Wednesday... so that disconnect is odd to me
Makes little sense especially since adp has as much information on payroll figures as anyone.
Globalist Illuminati Deep State shenanigans, obviously.
Here you go, 57... let me know if you need me to explain the chart for you
[TW]850888261534965762[/TW]
"Additionally, confidence surveys are part of what economists call “soft data” — or data based on survey responses — which is different from “hard data” like the jobs numbers and GDP reports which pull from data collected by government agencies. Since the election, soft data have rallied while hard data have been lagging in their rate of improvement."
This was my point -- pointing to something as arbitrary / subjective as "confidence" or "optimism" to justify Trumps first months just seems flimsy
Was the polling done at a Wal-Mart or cracker Barrel ? Whole Foods ?
College town vs rural outpost?
Inner city or suburb ?
Let's let this play out a little longer before we determine success or failure.
We'll see