The Trump Presidency

“The source close to Deutsche Bank says that the co-signers of Donald Trump’s Deutsche Bank loans are Russian billionaires close to Vladimir Putin,” O’Donnell revealed.

Check out our new podcast, 'We've Got Issues,' focusing on the hot stories of the week.

“If true, that would explain every kind word Donald Trump has ever said about Russia and Vladimir Putin,” he explained. “If true, that would be a significant factor in Vladimir Putin’s publicly stated preference for presidential candidate Donald Trump over presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.”
 
Last edited:
This is a tad more complicated than Trump's loan.


Stephanie Kennedy
@WordswithSteph
·
8h
“Why did Justice Kennedy retire so abruptly? What role did his son at Deutsche Bank play?

Who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt

plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?” — via



last fall I wondered aloud if Russian involvement in the 2016 elections wasn't just the tip of the iceberg and in some respects the least of Trump/Russian transgressions.
This is a startling revelation.

People also questioning Trumps knowledge of this story breaking while at G7
 
thethe said:
Something called Russia collusion which 'Trumps' that for the D's
Click to expand...

As a reminder:

1) The Trump campaign manager offered private briefings to an oligarch and shared private polling data with a GRU agent, with instructions to pass it on
2) Trump openly encouraged the Russians and WikiLeaks in their theft and dissemination of the Clinton emails
3) Trump instructed members of his campaign to get the emails and they in turn passed on the assignment to cutout Peter W Smith
4) The Trump campaign sought to find out the content and timing of the WikiLeaks releases so as to weaponize them for maximum effect
5) Meanwhile back at the ranch the Trump Organization was negotiating a lucrative real estate venture in Moscow
6) When briefed by the FBI in August 2016 on Russian efforts to interfere in the elections, Trump opted not to share any information about the contacts between his campaign and the Russians
 
Last edited:
Lawrence O'Donnell
✔
@Lawrence

Last night I made an error in judgment by reporting an item about the president’s finances that didn’t go through our rigorous verification and standards process. I shouldn’t have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air. I will address the issue on my show tonight.
 
nsacpi said:
As a reminder:

1) The Trump campaign manager offered private briefings to an oligarch and shared private polling data with a GRU agent, with instructions to pass it on
2) Trump openly encouraged the Russians and WikiLeaks in their theft and dissemination of the Clinton emails
3) Trump instructed members of his campaign to get the emails and they in turn passed on the assignment to cutout Peter W Smith
4) The Trump campaign sought to find out the content and timing of the WikiLeaks releases so as to weaponize them for maximum effect
5) Meanwhile back at the ranch the Trump Organization was negotiating a lucrative real estate venture in Moscow
6) When briefed by the FBI in August 2016 on Russian efforts to interfere in the elections, Trump opted not to share any information about the contacts between his campaign and the Russians
Click to expand...

Hey!

Another list that amounted to nothing.
 
thethe said:
Hey!

Another list that amounted to nothing.
Click to expand...

I have a different take. What it amounts to is a betrayal of our electoral processes and democratic values. And the Chosen One seems to have an insight (rare for being correct) that it taints his presidency.
 
Shepard Smith: "Puerto Rico didn't receive $92 million and there's no new Wall".

let's guess who said PR got $92M and boasted about new wall

Is there a retraction or apology coming ?
As in reputable news agencies
..........

Did I miss the retraction on Seth Rich or the Central Park 5 ?


O'Donnell was wrong but ...
he did the adult thing. Owned up, took it back and apologized
 
Last edited:
And there is also nothing neutral or random about how our system works. The electoral college tilts outcomes toward white voters, conservative voters and certain regions of the country. People outside these groups and places are supposed to sit back and accept their relative disenfranchisement. There is no reason they should, and at some point, they won’t. This will lead to a meltdown.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...2b3a8c-c98f-11e9-be05-f76ac4ec618c_story.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top