Tomahawking4life
Awaiting a Promotion
we lock up people for long periods of time for a plant that grows wild and doesn't kill anyone
yes, i would say it is unjust
Cant argue with that.
we lock up people for long periods of time for a plant that grows wild and doesn't kill anyone
yes, i would say it is unjust
Cant argue with that.
You can't possibly believe people are in jail for long periods of time for weed possession. That's ludicrous.
For Christos and Markela Sourovelis, for whom the worst thing was losing their home, “Room 101” was Courtroom 478 in City Hall. This “courtroom’s” name is Orwellian: There was neither judge nor jury in it. There the city government enriched itself — more than $64 million in a recent 11-year span — by disregarding due process requirements in order to seize and sell the property of people who have not been accused, never mind convicted, of a crime.
[...] At a 2015 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on forfeiture abuses, [Senator Jeff Sessions said:] In seizing property suspected of involvement in a crime, government “should not have a burden of proof higher than in a normal civil case.”
IJ’s Robert Everett Johnson notes that this senator missed a few salient points: In civil forfeiture there usually is no proper “judicial process.” There is no way of knowing how many forfeitures involve criminals because the government takes property without even charging anyone with a crime. The government’s vast prosecutorial resources are one reason it properly bears the burden of proving criminal culpability “beyond a reasonable doubt.” A sued businessperson does not have assets taken until he or she has lost in a trial, whereas civil forfeiture takes property without a trial and the property owner must wage a protracted, complex and expensive fight to get it returned. The Senate Judiciary Committee might want to discuss all this when considering the nominee to be the next attorney general, Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions.