AerchAngel
<B>Secretary of Statistics</B>
Depending on days or months is the answer.
Because as soon as your load go in and attach, it is an embryo.
Things They Say
- Thread starter Runnin
- Start date
Depending on days or months is the answer.
Because as soon as your load go in and attach, it is an embryo.
sturg33
I
It is interesting to me that you mock Trump calling news you agree with fake... But you call news you disagree with fake
Runnin
Well-known member
???
You really should take a break from trolling every once in a while. I'm well aware of your knee-jerk opposition to any post I make. It's really not necessary to remind me of it.
Yes, I find it interesting that even Laura Ingram thinks Pruitt should go. You don't?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
"Where are the babies, Mitch?"
Louisville protestor
https://www.salon.com/2018/07/07/pr...mcconnell-as-he-leaves-louisville-restaurant/
Mitch McConnell harassed by protestors at a restaurant. Also his wife faced protesters as she left Georgetown university. The great part of this to me is that I hate both sides so this can escalate with no fear of my own side facing it.
Louisville protestor
https://www.salon.com/2018/07/07/pr...mcconnell-as-he-leaves-louisville-restaurant/
Mitch McConnell harassed by protestors at a restaurant. Also his wife faced protesters as she left Georgetown university. The great part of this to me is that I hate both sides so this can escalate with no fear of my own side facing it.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
http://time.com/5332740/immigration-judge-boy/?utm_source=reddit.com
“I’m embarrassed to ask it, because I don’t know who you would explain it to, unless you think that a 1-year-old could learn immigration law,”
Judge John W. Richardson when he was required to ask a 1 year old defendant if he understood the proceedings.
“I’m embarrassed to ask it, because I don’t know who you would explain it to, unless you think that a 1-year-old could learn immigration law,”
Judge John W. Richardson when he was required to ask a 1 year old defendant if he understood the proceedings.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
https://lawandcrime.com/race-relati...ndom-black-people-to-boost-stats-report-says/
"if they have burglaries that are open cases that are not solved yet, if you see anybody black walking our streets and they have somewhat of a record, arrest them so we cann pin all the burglaries."
Biscayne Park Police Chief Raimundo Atesiano
In his 2 years as chief 19 of 20 burglaries were "solved". The year after he left they solved 0 burglaries. All 19 convicted were black.....
"if they have burglaries that are open cases that are not solved yet, if you see anybody black walking our streets and they have somewhat of a record, arrest them so we cann pin all the burglaries."
Biscayne Park Police Chief Raimundo Atesiano
In his 2 years as chief 19 of 20 burglaries were "solved". The year after he left they solved 0 burglaries. All 19 convicted were black.....
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
https://www.theroot.com/cop-fired-f...nkey-1827544211/amp?__twitter_impression=true
"we got all the Alabama porch monkeys contained"
police Lt. Charles DeShazer - but dont worry he was re-hired and is back "protecting and serving"
"we got all the Alabama porch monkeys contained"
police Lt. Charles DeShazer - but dont worry he was re-hired and is back "protecting and serving"
Runnin
Well-known member
GLOAT - Greatest Liar of All Time.
And a clearly diminishing capacity for syntax. It seems that his long used BS lines are starting to jumble together in his head and be even more incomprehensible than usual. But luckily for him that doesn't hurt since actual truth has long since been thrown away. It's all meant to misdirect and confuse anyway. His grammatical confusion only enhances the effect.
I thought that I made myself very clear by having just reviewed the transcript. Now, I have to say I came back and I said, “What is going on? What’s the big deal?” So I got a transcript, I reviewed it, I actually went out and reviewed a clip of an answer that I gave. And I realize that there is a need for some clarification. It should’ve been obvious, I thought it would be obvious, but I would like to clarify just in case it wasn’t. In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word ‘would’ instead of “wouldn’t.” The sentence should have been “I don’t see any reason why I wouldn’t or why it wouldn’t be Russia.” So just to repeat it, I said the word “would” instead of “wouldn’t” and the sentence should’ve been, and I thought it would be maybe a little unclear on the transcript or unclear on the actual video. The sentence should have been, “I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia.” Sort of a double negative. So you can put that in and I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself.
And a clearly diminishing capacity for syntax. It seems that his long used BS lines are starting to jumble together in his head and be even more incomprehensible than usual. But luckily for him that doesn't hurt since actual truth has long since been thrown away. It's all meant to misdirect and confuse anyway. His grammatical confusion only enhances the effect.
I thought that I made myself very clear by having just reviewed the transcript. Now, I have to say I came back and I said, “What is going on? What’s the big deal?” So I got a transcript, I reviewed it, I actually went out and reviewed a clip of an answer that I gave. And I realize that there is a need for some clarification. It should’ve been obvious, I thought it would be obvious, but I would like to clarify just in case it wasn’t. In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word ‘would’ instead of “wouldn’t.” The sentence should have been “I don’t see any reason why I wouldn’t or why it wouldn’t be Russia.” So just to repeat it, I said the word “would” instead of “wouldn’t” and the sentence should’ve been, and I thought it would be maybe a little unclear on the transcript or unclear on the actual video. The sentence should have been, “I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia.” Sort of a double negative. So you can put that in and I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself.
Last edited:
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
"You know the Trump Putin meeting was a success because all the Neocons are not very happy"
Ron Paul.
Ron Paul.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
"for her to take a day off every week, thats four days a month that she'll be out. And we dont know what she will be out doing with her passport".
kuwaiti instagram star objecting to new law mandating a day off for Filipino servants.
kuwaiti instagram star objecting to new law mandating a day off for Filipino servants.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
"we made Trump nix the Iran deal"
Benjamin Netanyahu
Benjamin Netanyahu
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I love how they name bills so ignorant people react based on face value. They dont introduce bills called "Fist the American People up the Ass Act". National Suicide Hotline is just a way for people to pretend like they are doing something positive. If people want it to be a thing then fund it with private money. How expensive can it possibly be? I am sure the government spends 10 times as much as it really takes.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
"And thats sort of where we are in todays world, unfortunately. The idea that the state doesnt have rights to limit individuals wants and passions. I disagree with that. I think we absolutely have rights because there are consequences to letting people live out whatever wants or passions they desire. And we are seeing it in our society"
Rick Santorum -
Rick Santorum -