TLHLIM

I mean there's been tons of data saying that people in blue areas... and rich college campuses, have a massive outsized proportion of people claiming they're gay. The response is always that it is more acceptable to be open about it. But I think that's nonsense. What did Brown university have? Like 47% LGBTQ or something?

cmon now

then there's other things I'd make some healthy wages on. things like:

- blue counties have a higher % than red counties
- rich people have a higher % than poor people
- white people have a higher % than non white people
- kids with no father in the home have a higher % than kids with a father in the home
- kids who's parents are gay are a higher % than kids whose parents are stragith

which of the above would you disagree with?
There is a disproportionate amount of black males being gay but not females it seems

But that may speak less to your white vs Non white point and more to the fatherless home one
 
I mean there's been tons of data saying that people in blue areas... and rich college campuses, have a massive outsized proportion of people claiming they're gay. The response is always that it is more acceptable to be open about it. But I think that's nonsense. What did Brown university have? Like 47% LGBTQ or something?

cmon now

then there's other things I'd make some healthy wages on. things like:

- blue counties have a higher % than red counties
- rich people have a higher % than poor people
- white people have a higher % than non white people
- kids with no father in the home have a higher % than kids with a father in the home
- kids who's parents are gay are a higher % than kids whose parents are stragith

which of the above would you disagree with?
don't forget the well-educated part
 
I don’t disagree with any of that, but you seem to be taking the position that this trend is one-sided and not a combination of blue-state and red-state influences. Why must it be that blue states are churning out fake gays and not that red states are churning out fake straights?
there are no fake straights in red areas
 
the question is - do you all believe this is legitimate or is there a social aspect driving these numbers. If you believe they are legitimate, then we can agree you're retarded and move on

F1k69LLWcBgsll1
 
the question is - do you all believe this is legitimate or is there a social aspect driving these numbers. If you believe they are legitimate, then we can agree you're retarded and move on

F1k69LLWcBgsll1
I think one thing you’re missing here is that the type of people more likely to be at Ivy League schools are the ones who might have an openness to their sexuality. College kids experiencing new things (influencing that Gen Z number as well) are likely more open to questioning their sexuality than a grown adult who’s had time to figure themselves out, and have more hormones helping to “affirm” their attraction to the same sex. I’d also think Ivy League students on average would be a self-selected bunch when it comes to questioning the way of the world, so to speak. The type of person studying, say gender studies or sociology at Brown University might have a more open mind on this particular topic than the average person.
 
Perhaps more important to me than what the data is telling us is the fact that I don’t give a fuck if today’s youth like touching genitals that are the same as theirs or different.
 
I think one thing you’re missing here is that the type of people more likely to be at Ivy League schools are the ones who might have an openness to their sexuality. College kids experiencing new things (influencing that Gen Z number as well) are likely more open to questioning their sexuality than a grown adult who’s had time to figure themselves out, and have more hormones helping to “affirm” their attraction to the same sex. I’d also think Ivy League students on average would be a self-selected bunch when it comes to questioning the way of the world, so to speak. The type of person studying, say gender studies or sociology at Brown University might have a more open mind on this particular topic than the average person.
But the gen z number is growing compared to past generations
 
Perhaps more important to me than what the data is telling us is the fact that I don’t give a fuck if today’s youth like touching genitals that are the same as theirs or different.
You should.

Society needs to children to be born and when they are born, they do best when they are raised in a house with a mother and a father
 
You should.

Society needs to children to be born and when they are born, they do best when they are raised in a house with a mother and a father
Again, I don’t accept the premise that a gay person won’t contribute to the children being born thing. There’s plenty of straight people not having kids already. And statistically you’re right, but having two loving fathers or two loving mothers will still produce good outcomes much of the time.
 
Perhaps more important to me than what the data is telling us is the fact that I don’t give a fuck if today’s youth like touching genitals that are the same as theirs or different.
What about parades with dicks out in front of kids

That still cool ?
 
What about parades with dicks out in front of kids

That still cool ?
We’ve reached the “throwing shit against the wall” phase of this argument. I’m not pro-dicks out in front of kids, but I do not care if the owners of those dicks prefer dicks over vaginas generally. We can agree that some actions/displays at some Pride events are not appropriate for all families without that meaning I should cede any ground on not caring about someone’s sexual orientation.
 
I don’t disagree with any of that, but you seem to be taking the position that this trend is one-sided and not a combination of blue-state and red-state influences. Why must it be that blue states are churning out fake gays and not that red states are churning out fake straights?
if you don't disagree with any of that, then you agree that there is something social about the phenonomen
 
Back
Top