Today in Rand Paul

Metaphysicist said:
The bill is almost completely symbolic. That you consider a reckoning with this country's horrible racial history to be "virtue signaling" is gross.

The real "virtual signaling" is what Paul and Amash are doing. Blocking a purely positive symbolic bill because [insert dumb libertarian reason].
Click to expand...

So signing the unconstitutional bill does nothing?

Sign me up!
 



If I can hijack this thread a little bit. I root for the worst possible outcomes in these protests because I believe we had a chance to fix this stuff we just chose not to. Maybe if it gets worse that will change.
 



This anti lynching bill is nothing but empty rhetoric. What they are doing is giving law enforcement even more vague power. Mark my words, this change will be used against black people more than against people who hurt black people.
 
cajunrevenge said:



This anti lynching bill is nothing but empty rhetoric. What they are doing is giving law enforcement even more vague power. Mark my words, this change will be used against black people more than against people who hurt black people.
Click to expand...

Why shouldnt we give the people who are bad to black people even more power???
 
sturg33 said:
So signing the unconstitutional bill does nothing?

Sign me up!
Click to expand...

You have repeatedly shown you have no idea what is in the constitution.

But I appreciate your nonsensical contradictory defenses of "this bill will have very bad effects" and "this bill is pointless."
 
Kamala as a prosecutor needs to shut the hell up on the issue. She was part of the problem and did nothing when she had the chance. Anyone with experience will tell you they rather have a prosecutor with integrity than a judge with integrity.



They like Biden can only see this issue on the surface level. Every tool we give police they have to consider its potential for abuse. Just look at civil asset forfeiture. It was sold as a tool to take down kingpins but the average seizure is like 100 bucks.
 
weird clips to go with your comment. lol



yeah, you can still overall not like rand paul and still find yourself on some of the same sides of issues

just like the guy said in the 2nd clip

that you think that is crazy or odd etc speaks volumes about you
 
Rand is right. I can point you to a lot of "experts" who were dumbasses. The federal government's "expert" on marijuana for 30 years from late 30's to early 60's said he smoked marijuana once and it turned him into a bat. Watson "experts" were full of **** until I think the 90's.
 
he came out against Trumps militarization of the cities ---

This could be his moment.
We will see
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top