Trump Indictment Watch

"The problem for Trump is the underlying law. The New York law does not require an actual victim or even loss of money."



From the rights favorite constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley.


Trumps aleady lost on the facts of the case. The parts that dont require intent he has already been convicted of because its that clear and obvious. His defense of the case has been what people call the Chewbacca defense. No doubt resident legal scholar Garmel knows what that is without needing to look it up.
 
"The problem for Trump is the underlying law. The New York law does not require an actual victim or even loss of money."



From the rights favorite constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley.


Trumps aleady lost on the facts of the case. The parts that dont require intent he has already been convicted of because its that clear and obvious. His defense of the case has been what people call the Chewbacca defense. No doubt resident legal scholar Garmel knows what that is without needing to look it up.

lol. Taken out of context because Turley says this case is nonsense despite the fact that he's in legal trouble.. This case is a laugher because the government doesn't set valuations, the buyer and seller do. It will be overturned.
 
If its overturned it would be setting a brand new precedent for loan fraud. The state can only act on what the current interpretation of the law is. I think the odds of that happening are very slightly higher than the odds of Joe Biden solving the Rieman hypothesis.
 
The appellate court or SCOTUS if it gets that far will look at the state's valuations for Trump's properties and laugh. Besides, all of this is too subjective to come up "real value" for a property and it's not up to the state to determine what it is.
 
Cool. We can disagree. Thats fine. If we cant even agree on the goalposts then theres no real point in arguing in the first place because theres no point either of us could be proven wrong.
 
And Judge Aileen Cannon's ridiculous special master order has been reversed by the 11th circuit court of appeals in a unanimous verdict. Shocking no one but Trump.
 
[tw]1722958129518797047[/tw]

I love the people that mock Loomer.

Especially the RDS supporters because she was instrumental in ensuring the D's didn't steal the 2018 Florida Gov election.
 
[tw]1722958129518797047[/tw]

I love the people that mock Loomer.

Especially the RDS supporters because she was instrumental in ensuring the D's didn't steal the 2018 Florida Gov election.

Wow, that was a well written persuasive letter. I'm not a Loomer fan but she really stuck it to the judge and his wife. For those who cry "Ginny Thomas" as if that is somehow equal to this case it would only be equal if Ginny was online attacking those going before Thomas which she didn't.
 
Wow, that was a well written persuasive letter. I'm not a Loomer fan but she really stuck it to the judge and his wife. For those who cry "Ginny Thomas" as if that is somehow equal to this case it would only be equal if Ginny was online attacking those going before Thomas which she didn't.

Loomer has to be attacked because she exposes so much. Especially the faux RDS campaign.
 
Honestly I am just shocked that the wife of the Judge routinely attacked unfairly by Trump has a negative opinion to share about Trump. I am truly horrified.
 
Honestly I am just shocked that the wife of the Judge routinely attacked unfairly by Trump has a negative opinion to share about Trump. I am truly horrified.

It wasn’t happening turned to it’s happening and of course it’s ok very fast.
 
[tw]1723457323878760792[/tw]

Of course the prosecution will reject this.

American people deserve to see every second of this sham.
 
Thethe becoming a full blown loomer sycophant is yet another predictable and tragic descent into retardation

Perhaps we should start a thread of Loomers greatest hits...
 
Back
Top