Two Florida sources confirm Marlins' interest in Gattis

I do not want Gattis going to Florida unless our doctors confirm his legs won't last another year.
 
blueagleace1 said:
The strikeouts and hitting w/RISP (except Freeman) were and have been our downfall.
Click to expand...

Fun fact, that's not true in regards to hitting w/RISP. Jason, Simmons and Bossman hit better w/RISP than without, Chris Johnson was way better w/RISP. ONly Justin was worse without runners in scoring position.

In fact as a team, the Braves wRC+ was slightly better w/RISP than without as we hit at an 87 w/RISP and an 86 normally. We sucked as a team hitting, it wasn't contained to hitting w/RISP.
 
zitothebrave said:
Fun fact, that's not true in regards to hitting w/RISP. Jason, Simmons and Bossman hit better w/RISP than without, Chris Johnson was way better w/RISP. ONly Justin was worse without runners in scoring position.

In fact as a team, the Braves wRC+ was slightly better w/RISP than without as we hit at an 87 w/RISP and an 86 normally. We sucked as a team hitting, it wasn't contained to hitting w/RISP.
Click to expand...

Hm just because a couple of the guys hit better with RISP than without doesn't mean our hitting with RISP didn't kill us. It did. It was overall poor.
 
yeezus said:
Hm just because a couple of the guys hit better with RISP than without doesn't mean our hitting with RISP didn't kill us. It did. It was overall poor.
Click to expand...

I literally said in that post that we were better w/RISP than regular. Our issue was we sucked at hitting, not just w/RISP

Braves stats as a team

wRC+ overall - 86
w/RISP - 87
w/Men on base - 89
Empty - 84.
 
zitothebrave said:
I literally said in that post that we were better w/RISP than regular. Our issue was we sucked at hitting, not just w/RISP

Braves stats as a team

wRC+ overall - 86
w/RISP - 87
w/Men on base - 89
Empty - 84.
Click to expand...

OP said our hitting with RISP hurt us. It did, in fact hurt, as we were below average there. Hitting in general hurt us. But so did RISP. You said "that's not true." I'm not sure you read what you wrote.
 
yeezus said:
OP said our hitting with RISP hurt us. It did, in fact hurt, as we were below average there. Hitting in general hurt us. But so did RISP. You said "that's not true." I'm not sure you read what you wrote.
Click to expand...

Your hitting in situational stats are usually pretty close. We sucked at hitting. Hitting w/RISP was a translation of that. The idea that "we sucked at hitting w/RISP" implies that we were doing OK at other aspects of hitting. Not being worse.
 
zitothebrave said:
Your hitting in situational stats are usually pretty close. We sucked at hitting. Hitting w/RISP was a translation of that. The idea that "we sucked at hitting w/RISP" implies that we were doing OK at other aspects of hitting. Not being worse.
Click to expand...

I think it means we sucked at hitting w/ RISP. Which we did.
 
Guy 1: It's cold in Antarctica in winter
Guy 2: It's always cold in Antarctica
Guy 1: well, you're wrong
Guy 2: no, I'm right, therefore you're wrong
the rest of us: please die
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top