No, but I'm tired of musical youtubers praising the Beatles every step of the way because they're the first artist they fell in love with. Beatles were pioneers, they are talented. But they're all middling musicians, middling vocalists, who performed incredibly well together.
But people hype them up, you know who should be hyped up from that era instead? Little Richard. When you talk about solo careers of Paul McCartney or John Lennon, you know who smokes the pants off them? Stevie Wonder. And I'm not going back to better musical artists like Zeppelin, Rush, The Who, Queen, Pink Floyd,Cream, the Doors (minus Morrison's droning vocals), or the Jimi Hendrix Experience who were much talented musicians. I'm talking about more pop based artists because that's the realm the beatles played in.
But I'll go with a different hot take. Rolling Stones are massively overrated. Keith Richards is an amazing riff writer, Charlie Watt is the most underrated member of that band, and Mick Jagger has next level charisma (how else could someone that ugly front a band signing that poorly make a career) but basically they chalk up a hit per album, think of it this way, there's 30 Stones Studio Albums, can you name without thninking 30 rolling Stones songs? How many Zeppelin Songs can you name? Cause they released less than a 3rd of the albums.
