zbhargrove
Well-known member
Yes
1. All Shelby Miller has proven is he hasn't been a great pitcher so far. Career FIP- of 110. His ERA has been decent but that's largely boosted off one season.
2. He's not undercontrol for 6 years, he's under control for 4.
So yes I take someone who could potentially be a start for 6 years, over someone who's been average and we have under control for 4 years. Don't get me wrong, I don't despise Miller, IMO for Heyward and Walden we should have gotten Miller and their top prospect, like Alex Reyes of Stephen Piscotty.
The 4 year thing was a cursory misstep on my part... its not really that big of a difference and does nothing to change my argument. You aren't going to get a MLB pitcher with huge upside PLUS that team's top prospect for a one year rental of Heyward. And from everything I read, Jenkins could very well be a fantastic get.