Honestly if it makes 10% of the natives feel bad, then that's too much. As a culture so many have lost their identity, so for them being called Redskin may mean nothing to them anymore because their culture's been murdered.
I think Jason Taylor put it well
"Look, it’s offensive. If you look it up in the dictionary, it’s an offensive term. And I think if you get one segment of people that are offended by it, it warrants some looking at. "
Jon Richie also had some good points in there.
"“I grew up in Central Pennsylvania when the Redskins were good,” Ritchie continued. “They were close; I was a fan. I was a fan of the guys on that team. The name didn’t matter to me, but the guys, like John Riggins, and the Fun Bunch with Art Monk, and Dexter Manley: that’s what mattered. The personalities on the team are what matters. Daniel Snyder should know that. The name does not matter. But the name does matter to some people in our society, because it is a nod to the decimation of a tradition and a culture that was once prevalent here in the United States. If it offends anyone, the name should be out.”"
Of course you're gonna say they aren't natives so who GAF.
Lastly I'll link you to a wikipedia page about NA tribes who're opposed to the name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washin...sy#Native_Americans_and_organizations_opposed
Jason Taylor needs to say what dictionary he's looking at then.