Woman's March

you are claiming racism in defense of Zionist Israel.

You miss the irony of oppressors claiming racism
doncha ?
 
perhaps I characterized your feelings towards Palestinians as "racist" in error

I correct that to intolerance and extreme prejudice leaning towards bigotry aimed at Palestinians and all those that practice the Muslim faith.

But I think, hope, all along you knew what I meant
 
perhaps I characterized your feelings towards Palestinians as "racist" in error

I correct that to intolerance and extreme prejudice leaning towards bigotry aimed at Palestinians and all those that practice the Muslim faith.

But I think, hope, all along you knew what I meant

I do have negative feeling towards Islam and that is because of their beliefs. Its well documented through worldwide polling. And if you dont have similair feelings then i worry about your tolerance level for hatred.
 
they want Palestine back or at least to share it in peace.

this isn't hard

Israel was given to the Jews because of the unspeakable horrors inflictrd throughout history. The previous occupants have many other places to go.
 
[Tw]1086762171042840578[/tw]

The best part about the trump presidency is he gets his opposition to show their true colors.

The womens march is a pillar of the progressive movement and like corbyn in the UK we see that progressives are inherently antisemetic.

https://reason.com/archives/2019/01/18/the-womens-march-distracts-from-americas

In the wake of Trump's victory, a collective "yuck" gave the Women's March a spectacular turnout for its first event in 2017, when about one million women showed up just in Washington, D.C., making it the largest single-day protest in history. However, as I noted at the time, this was clearly unsustainable. If you cut through the hype, it was evident even then that the march was a "feel good exercise in search of a cause" that would run into problems for the simple reason that the fear and loathing of Trump isn't a sufficiently strong glue to keep the movement together.

Yep, pretty much
 
https://reason.com/archives/2019/01/18/the-womens-march-distracts-from-americas

In the wake of Trump's victory, a collective "yuck" gave the Women's March a spectacular turnout for its first event in 2017, when about one million women showed up just in Washington, D.C., making it the largest single-day protest in history. However, as I noted at the time, this was clearly unsustainable. If you cut through the hype, it was evident even then that the march was a "feel good exercise in search of a cause" that would run into problems for the simple reason that the fear and loathing of Trump isn't a sufficiently strong glue to keep the movement together.

Yep, pretty much

No rights denied. Just a bunch of drama hoping for special attention
 
After raising children and having Grandchildren I've learned that people looking for "special attention" in 99.9% of the time feel the need for "special attention"

I think what you are doing sturg is what the women would call "mansplaining"
Ever heard of that ? Ever caught yourself ?


a shot in the dark here but, that is kinda the point
 
Last edited:
Back
Top