Remember the outrage about the fake tiki torch march?
Because destroying America is the entire point of our communists
[Tw]1787820404226068563[/tw]
I have to say it is highly embarrassing that students at the University of Ottawa can't spell Palestine. What is happening to our neighbor to the north. What hath tryrant Trudeau wrought.Don't worry I know you were the #1 cheerleader of destroying a generation of kids
I have to say it is highly embarrassing that students at the University of Ottawa can't spell Palestine. What is happening to our neighbor to the north. What hath tryrant Trudeau wrought.
now they can't spell
Goal ambiguity might be a natural by-product of modern institutions trying to be everything to everyone. But eventually, they’ll pay the price. Any institution that finds itself promoting a thousand priorities at once may find it difficult to promote any one of them effectively. In a crisis, goal ambiguity may look like fecklessness or hypocrisy.
For example, in the past few years, many elite colleges and universities have cast themselves as “anti-racist” and “decolonial” enterprises that hire “scholar activists” as instructors and publish commentary on news controversies, as if they were editorial boards that happened to collect tuition. This rebranding has set schools up for failure as they navigate the Gaza-war protests. When former Harvard President Claudine Gay declined to tell Congress that calls for Jewish genocide were automatic violations of the school’s rules of harassment, she might not have caused a stir—if Harvard had a reputation for accommodating even radical examples of political speech. But Gay’s statements stood in lurid contrast to the university’s unambiguous condemnation of students and professors who had offended other minority groups. This apparent hypocrisy was goal ambiguity collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions: one mandate to police offensive speech versus another mandate to allow activist groups to speak offensively.
Confronted with the Gaza-war protests, colleges are again struggling to balance competing priorities: free speech, the safety of students and staff, and basic school functions, such as the ability to walk to a lecture hall. That would be hard enough if they hadn’t sent the message to students that protesting was an integral part of the university experience. As Tyler Austin Harper wrote in The Atlantic, university administrators have spent years “recruiting social-justice-minded students and faculty to their campuses under the implicit, and often explicit, promise that activism is not just welcome but encouraged.” But once these administrators got exactly what they asked for—a campus-wide display of social-justice activism—they realized that aesthetic rebelliousness and actual rebellion don’t mix well, in their opinion. So they called the cops.
NO ONE KNOWS WHAT UNIVERSITIES ARE FOR
By: Derek Thompson, The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/a...t-eating-american-universities-inside/678324/