Just know that if Twit leaves this winter, it will be a Cox disciple. This entire org centers every decision around the cox sun.. it will be Walt or Tui or some other idiot that is a left over from the good ol days of the 90's where Cox was a brilliant manager for taking his team of 5 hall of famers to the playoff every year.
I don't think this is necessarily fair. AA inherited Snitker. I suspect he's as frustrated with some of the decisions Snit makes as we are. But how do you fire a guy who's an organizational lifer with a recent WS title and on a long playoff/division title streak?
My guess and hope is that AA wants to break the cycle of the Cox family tree as much as many of us do. Like Alabama football finally reached its potential once they gave up on the obsession with hiring "Bear's Boys", maybe the Braves can get the most out of their talent with someone who didn't work or play for Bobby.
Snitker is a Bobby Cox disciple in name only. He certainly doesn’t manage like him at all (except for maybe leaving his starter in too long).
Snitker is a Bobby Cox disciple in name only. He certainly doesn’t manage like him at all (except for maybe leaving his starter in too long).
I'd have to look back over the Cox era. I don't recall him ever having a super-utility guy, but he did do strict platoons at a couple of positions seemingly each year (both in Toronto and Atlanta). One of the big differences in eras is that with the universal DH and the need for more bullpen arms, it is more difficult to shuffle guys around with a short bench, especially if you have the same DH everyday. I know the 2024 budget constraints played into bench construction and that's something I wish the Braves would give more attention to if budget room becomes available after the big dominos fall during the off-season.
Snitker is more Sparky Anderson than Bobby Cox. His strongest quality on the field is legible handwriting. He runs a good clubhouse, but he can't seem to play bad cop (and when he does, it comes off clumsily). I'm not going to get into the Freeman/Olson debate because the on-field part of the equation has yet to be played out, but I do think Freeman (and maybe Swanson) is missed in the clubhouse because I am of the impression that Freddie could get on guys.
He is an org guy that preaches at the alter of Cox.. they might not be exactly similar (Cox at least played bench guys more) they are both dino managers that go by gut and old school ways. I am almost ready to go the full kapler experience at this point.
Not feeling you on that but I can see it that way too I guess. Cub fans have buyers remorse from those I know. This club is missing much more than that. That button down straight lace approach is fine, but you need a few crazies in my opinionI miss Swanson personally. He was the heart of the team imo. he was fiery and passionate and I think that rubbed off on others. I know his contract is hard to swallow, but he that always seemed to be the player you want around for some of the intangibles.
Not feeling you on that but I can see it that way too I guess. Cub fans have buyers remorse from those I know. This club is missing much more than that. That button down straight lace approach is fine, but you need a few crazies in my opinion