sturg33
I
Well, as I hope you're aware, it is impossible to provide evidence of something happening in a hypothetical.
But if you believe Rand Paul or Marco Rubio or whoever would have appointed leftist judges, then we will have to agree to disagree
2024 Field
- Thread starter Jaw
- Start date
Well, as I hope you're aware, it is impossible to provide evidence of something happening in a hypothetical.
But if you believe Rand Paul or Marco Rubio or whoever would have appointed leftist judges, then we will have to agree to disagree
Tapate50
Well-known member
Appointing right leaning judges is only part of the solution for the pro-life movement.
sturg33
I
Yes. Attacking states for passing life saving legislation as "terrible things" and turning his cult like into hateful bitter pro abortion advocates is a major betrayal
Its fantastic that Biden is undercutting her at every turn.
sturg33
I
Yes. My stance is that Clarence Thomas doesn't rule on a case based on what a former president campaigned on 6 years ago
chop2chip
Well-known member
Truly a brain dead move to criticize a governor whose state is about to smashed by a hurricane when you know he has the receipts.
Biden said today that DeSantis and him have been in close contact and that he’s doing a great job handling the disaster response.
Yikes
Biden said today that DeSantis and him have been in close contact and that he’s doing a great job handling the disaster response.
Yikes
sturg33
I
Correct. Now the real work begins. And Trump has decided to side with the baby killers
Then you are a fool if you think Trump had no influence on how these judges voted.
I'm sorry that your silly hatred of Trump blinds you into thinking that career politicians who have done nothing to stop abortions their entire careers were somehow just as likely to propel the pro-life movement this far forward.
LMAO, if you honestly believe that then you are thethe level insane.
sturg33
I
You've been pretty clear.
You've attacked pro life organizations.
You're on record saying pro life legislation is a mistake.
Your preferred policy position appears to be to protect abortion rights and then also create a massive healthcare entitlement system
And you also mocked me for losing a child in pregnancy.
The damage Trump has done to the cult in pretty massive
sturg33
I
OK so just so I'm clear.
You believe President Rubio would not have appointed conservative judges? Why do you believe that?
And you also believe the Supreme Court rules against Roe in 2022 becasue Trump campaigned on it in 2016? Not because of the unconstitutional nature of the law?
sturg33
I
Believe what?
Roe was killed.
States passed pro life legislation.
Trump called them a terrible thing.
When trump was asked about the amendment 3 in FL, he said he would be voting to have more time (to kill the baby)... he later reversed this position after backlash
He tweeted that his administration will be great for women's "reproductive rights" - we all know what is referring to
His wife just put out a book 1 month before the election with an unequivocal call for abortion rights
So what am I missing that is so obvious? The law was changed, and Trump has done nothing but knee cap the pro life movement ever since
The latter thing just didn't happen but I'm aware you're off the deep end the past two years.
I've attacked pro-life organizations the same way someone like Matt Walsh did against Lindsay Graham right before the 2022 midtersm.
I'm on record as saying pro-life groups have zero vision for strategy.
You are jus tmaking up my preferred position because you lack the ability to understand long term strategy.
Rubio would have never won - Nobody else would have. Pretending otherwise just shows your hatred.
I believe that Rubio would not have moved the pro-life movement forward.
I believe that Trump not only campaigned for overturning Roe V Wade, but actively worked towards overturning it and pushing the movement as whole forward during his presidency. I believe the Pro-life movement was never as strong as it was under his Presidency, with several states passing laws that challenged Roe v Wade. And I certainly believe those sort of conversations about Roe v Wade were discussed when selecting Justices.
Tapate50
Well-known member
It doesn't.
Of course it does becuase anyone else not named Trump is the nominee and HRC is the third/fourth Obama term.
6-3/7-2 leftist court.
What happens to Roe then?
Its very obvious whats happening here.