To be clear, my opposition to Gaetz is around the fact that there are more capable and qualified people to effectively do the job, AND the added benefit of not having the pedo smoke around them
This was Sturgs take before he went into the RDS cult.
Didn’t you complain about it?
A complete adversarial justice department with every reason to press charges decided not to and you guys still think this is real.
Its so sad how easily duped some of yall are.
Yeah - You just happen to mention the fact of the 'rumors' which 2 years ago you were ocnvinced were complete bull****.
Just admit you were caught for bieng in a cult and changing your beliefs. Its healthy!!! Just say srrrrrryyyyyyy
There’s a difference between the standard of proof in sending someone to prison vs. placing them in charge of sending people to prison.
Why do you even care what his take was on this? It’s apparently fine to pay for sex and sleep with high school girls in your 30s, and shouldn’t be considered when you’re nominated to head the DOJ, right?
Drug users I suppose are as bad as traffickers. You are clearly a choir boy if you think paying for sec precludes you from any office. It’s the oldest industry and it’s been happening for thousands of years.
If it’s completely consensual and not minors then there is nothing wrong with it.
You don’t live in the real world if you think paying for sex makes it that someone can’t be a tremendous prosecutor. Child like mindset.
Drug users are largely the victim in the drug trade. So no, your analogy does not hold water. And penalties for illegal drug use has largely been reduced nation wide while penalties for soliciting sex have largely increased. So yes, there is moral difference and literally every state has made that distinction in relation to its laws.
Can you remind me what cult I'm in?
Can you remind me why you're talking about 'rumors' when two years ago you completely dismissed it as bull****?
Can you remind me why you're talking about 'rumors' when two years ago you completely dismissed it as bull****?
Drug users are not victims (aside from when durgs are puirposefully laced to kill them). Its a choice many of us make becuase we enjoy the activity.
Choir boy stuff here.
[tw]1856825829269148081[/tw]
I suspect things like this are at the heart of your switch on the issue.
Certainly.
Multiple members of congress have commented on his issues since that post. McCarthy was investing him for it so he led the charge to dump him (then turned around and endorsed Scalise), he is being investigated again as we speak, and this nomination potentially allows him to escape the punishment of this investigation, which is very convenient
https://ethics.house.gov/press-releases/statement-regarding-matter-representative-matt-gaetz
Now, it all might just be a which hunt for the junior congressman from Florida for many years, but there is a **** ton of smoke here.
So again, my point is, I'm not sure what qualifies this guy to be the dude who takes down the deep state. We can do better, with the added benefit of not dealing with someone who potentially has a lot of dirt on him to blackmail with
Back to my question that you ignored, can you remind me what cult I'm in?
Yes, drug users are the victims. How TF is this even a discussion.
Drug pushers prey upon addicts. This isn't even an opinion. It's fact that is held by every single department, every single state government, and every single police department. It's largely the reason why state governments every in the US have reduced criminality on drug charges for possession.
Jesus Christ, just for one day. Just one day, do a ride along with the police. You are so far removed from reality it is ridiculous.
It's one thing to question the accusations against Gaetz. That's fine. Closed minded, but fine.
But to actually defend the acts themselves is a new sort of low I didn't think I'd actually see from thethe.