Economics Thread

American worker is protected by the tariffs because more jobs come about as a result. We are seeing that already with all investment decisions being released.
its fun to be as delusional as the 57s of the world... but per usual, there is no data or evidence that you are correct. reminder of the first term...

Conclusion
Trump’s first-term tariffs created a few thousand jobs in protected sectors like steel and washing machines but led to net job losses estimated at 245,000–300,000 across the economy, driven by higher input costs, retaliatory tariffs, and supply chain disruptions. Manufacturing employment slightly declined overall, and consumer costs rose significantly. While politically popular, the tariffs did not achieve their stated goal of broadly revitalizing U.S. manufacturing, with automation and global competition playing larger roles in job trends. For a deeper understanding, further analysis of specific industries and regional impacts would be needed, but the available evidence suggests a limited and costly impact on American jobs.
 
You really are a full blown, Bernie Sanders socialist
I miss the days when (R) rightly mocked and ridiculed political leaders who told us what we should need/want as consumers. Now their supporters cheer it on.

BTW, Trump has said maybe the kids who now get 30 dolls will now only get 2-3 …has he said what the kids who now get 1 doll will get?
 
I wasn't mad, I think it's funny that a Trump donor had his restaurants shut down because he/his managers were hiring illegals.

The fact you think I was mad goes to show how sensitive you are.

I do think it's important to have migrant workers though. Not illegals mind you but legal ones. Who should be brought in to do the work.
Hahahah sure !
I believe you

I am super sensitive though. Anyone can tell you. Charmin soft
 
Last edited:
I miss the days when (R) rightly mocked and ridiculed political leaders who told us what we should need/want as consumers. Now their supporters cheer it on.

BTW, Trump has said maybe the kids who now get 30 dolls will now only get 2-3 …has he said what the kids who now get 1 doll will get?
those kids will be sent to the ketchup factory
 
Whether tariffs are a good economic idea (they’re not) or a bad idea, completely ignores the question of why the president gets first and final say on trade.

We are creating the playbook for President AOC in realtime.
 
Whether tariffs are a good economic idea (they’re not) or a bad idea, completely ignores the question of why the president gets first and final say on trade.

We are creating the playbook for President AOC in realtime.
0% chance she ever becomes president - It would be a bloodbath for Democrats.

I pray that they nominate her for 2028.
 
0% chance she ever becomes president - It would be a bloodbath for Democrats.

I pray that they nominate her for 2028.
We’ve established the precedent that the president is allowed to declare an emergency and assume the power to unilaterally enact tariffs.

We have laid the groundwork for someone to come in and say “climate change is destroying the planet. We must immediately address this issue or risk global catastrophe. I hereby decree that a 500% tariff will be imposed on any country who does meet the standards set by the Paris Climate Accords”.
 
We’ve established the precedent that the president is allowed to declare an emergency and assume the power to unilaterally enact tariffs.

We have laid the groundwork for someone to come in and say “climate change is destroying the planet. We must immediately address this issue or risk global catastrophe. I hereby decree that a 500% tariff will be imposed on any country who does meet the standards set by the Paris Climate Accords”.

If thats what you think will happen then you're entitled to it.

I'm comfortable in both of these things:

1) Trumps actions have no bearing on if the Democrats would do anything extreme
2) This will never happen
 
I miss the days when (R) rightly mocked and ridiculed political leaders who told us what we should need/want as consumers. Now their s.upporters cheer it on.

BTW, Trump has said maybe the kids who now get 30 dolls will now only get 2-3 …has he said what the kids who now get 1 doll will get?
And Texas' AG is after our toothpaste now. From WSJ editorial board:

It’s harder to tell the difference these days between Republicans and left-wing Democrats. Take Ken Paxton, the Texas Attorney General and Senate candidate whose idea of a good government cause is to sue . . . toothpaste makers. Mr. Paxton said last week he is investigating Colgate-Palmolive Co., which makes the Colgate brand paste, and Procter & Gamble, which makes Crest. Their offense? He says they’ve been “marketing toothpaste products to parents and children in ways that are misleading, deceptive, and dangerous.”

He’s out to nail what he thinks is the vast fluoride toothpaste conspiracy. Mr. Paxton claims there is a “statistically significant association” between children who ingested too much fluoride and lower IQ scores. He says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends only a “rice-sized ‘smear’” for three-years old and the American Dental Association (ADA) recommends “no more than a pea-sized amount” for children between three and six.

Guess who else endorses the pea-sized amount? The toothpaste sellers, who put the same recommendation clear as day on their children’s toothpaste labels. The label on Crest Kids toothpaste says “use a pea-sized amount in children under 6.”

Mr. Paxton says he must act to ensure the toothpaste makers are not “putting Texas families in peril through their false, misleading, and deceptive marketing.” But the CDC website says fluoride “helps both children and adults prevent cavities.” The addition of fluoride to drinking water since 1962 is “1 of 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century.”

Mr. Paxton points to a 2024 National Toxicology Program study to suggest that fluoride is harming children, but the ADA says the study considered children who received fluoride levels twice what’s in drinking water. Fluoride has improved oral health, especially in rural communities. American Dental Association President Brett Kessler says dentists “see on a daily basis the benefits of fluoride—from both drinking fluoridated water and topically in products like fluoride toothpaste.”

Mr. Paxton is running against incumbent GOP Sen. John Cornyn, and he must figure there are primary votes in mimicking Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who blames fluoride for a laundry list of health problems. Oh, and the AG is also going after General Mills for dyes in breakfast cereals. He really is running against Lucky Charms.

As I recall some of y'all were up in arms over gas stoves and wood fired pizza ovens. I can't help but note there is actual for real evidence that fluoride has very significant health benefits. And gas stoves and wood fired overs have actual for real health hazards. Crazy.
 
Last edited:
Why is it inherently true if this Administration releases a job report?

Because they didn't have massive revisions (in the first term) like hte last one did.

Its a straight fact that hte autopen regime flat out lied about their job figures.
 
Back
Top