Markakis will be worth his salary for the first two years at least.
He hasn't been worth that salary since 2008
Markakis will be worth his salary for the first two years at least.
For a rebuilding team, this is a better move than start the clock of someone else.
And if he does well, rebuilds his value, Atl can get a prospect or even keep him next year, yes i know it's unlikely.
He hasn't been worth that salary since 2008
He's not a 2/3 pitcher. He's a 4ish ERA guy. A spot that would hopefully be filled by a young guy with potential if possible.
Cahill isn't a 2/3 guy, but he isn't an over the hill pitcher with no upside. Unfortunately this seems to be what this debate has detoured into.
I seriously cannot fathom how people are frowning down on this move. I'm okay with being apathetic towards it, but there seriously is no legitimate downside. I cannot be convinced otherwise.
I think a plausible case could have been made for retaining either Heyward or J. Upton. We weren't going to be able to keep both beyond 2015, so trying to get something more than a draft pick was in order. I agree that J. Upton is likely to remain the player he is (and that's pretty good). I guess I prefer Heyward a bit more because of what he may do in the future. I think he has the higher ceiling.
He certainly was worth 10 million last year.
He certainly was worth 10 million last year.
If you believe the statistical blip of his defense.
Possible...but I would suspect a move to a slower infield with what should be good defense up the middle and a pitching coach who made his money off a sinker can bring Cahil closer to what he was thought of when he first came to the big leagues. There was a time when people thought he was going to be an ace. He won't be there obviously but he could still be a good #3.
Cahill isn't a 2/3 guy, but he isn't an over the hill pitcher with no upside. Unfortunately this seems to be what this debate has detoured into.
I seriously cannot fathom how people are frowning down on this move. I'm okay with being apathetic towards it, but there seriously is no legitimate downside. I cannot be convinced otherwise.
Weren't we going to flip Wandy for a prospect at the deadline?
Weren't we going to flip Wandy for a prospect at the deadline?
He was a potential option to flip as were all the guys that were signed basically. The whole point was to try as many as possible and hope some worked. They just upgraded Wandy. Shoulnd't you be happy or will you just hate everything the Braves do from here moving forward?
Well I think Cahill isn't good. So no, I'm not that thrilled. If he is, it just gives us a worst draft pick. And I do hate that we have given so much money to garbage but we couldn't afford any premium talent.
5.5 mil is alot of money?
Interesting.
Still mad they traded Babe Ruth oops i mean Heyward.
You better believe if Cahil has a bounceback year that they will consider using those option years. 13M for a good #3 (hopefully a #2) is real cheap.