Dodgers have to pull the best pitcher in the game unexpectedly after 2 and the braves get 2 hits. What a pathetic performance
Not surprising, Simmons has had a great year.
Obviously we havent had much from SS this year.
Predictable posters showing up sparingly to talk about a perceived bad move of this current FO. Newk is going to be real good.
Predictable posters showing up sparingly to talk about a perceived bad move of this current FO. Newk is going to be real good.
What was Folty's BB/9 that year? What's is Newk's this year?
How much harder did Folty throw?
How many more types of pitches did Folty throw?
Are you still willing to suggest a 23 year old Folty and a 24 year old Newk are at all comparable?
What was Folty's BB/9 that year? What's is Newk's this year?
How much harder did Folty throw?
How many more types of pitches did Folty throw?
Are you still willing to suggest a 23 year old Folty and a 24 year old Newk are at all comparable?
MiLB careers...
Folty...
646.1 ip 609 h 286 bb 566 k
3.84 era
1.38 whip
.252 baa
Newcomb...
348.1 ip 271 h 186 bb 412 k
3.23 era
1.31 whip
.215 baa
That isn't even remotely close to answering the questions I posited.
Bb/9 is concerning for Newcomb, but it's the only stat folty has outdone him at. Newcomb has been better in MiLB and MLB at same stage of their careers. Newcomb will end up being good too
You're right. Folty only threw harder and had much better command than Newk, who is a year older when making his MLB debut (actually 2 years older, but we won't count Folty's tiny number of innings when he was 22).
Other than that, they're basically the same haha!
We all know how little velocity and command means for pitching success, right?
You're right. Folty only threw harder and had much better command than Newk, who is a year older when making his MLB debut (actually 2 years older, but we won't count Folty's tiny number of innings when he was 22).
Other than that, they're basically the same haha!
We all know how little velocity and command means for pitching success, right?
You saying Newcomb doesn't have the velocity from the left side to be successful? Newcomb's curve is the best pitch between the 2. If Newcomb can master the change, he'll be very good
No sarcasm here, but why do you identify rookie Folty as an example of success?
Take the time to read my post again.
Did I say he doesn't have enough velo, or did I say Folty has better velo?
If if if, that's all you can say about Newk.
It's pretty much what you say about any pitching prospect 8 starts into their career
I don't.
Go back and look at who compared them.
Please try to keep up with the conversation if you're going to chime in.