cajunrevenge
Well-known member
You mean asians?
Hollywood/Political Sex Offense Scandals (Now Louis CK and AL-GOPSenateNom Roy Moore)
- Thread starter The Tariff King
- Start date
You mean asians?
If goldy and you were directly related to a child molestation case involving a colleague, then your analogy might have merit.
how many instances of one shaky accusation taking down a person are there? it's not the case with anyone who's been discussed so far. if schiano saw that happening and did little to nothing, sure, i could see that being held against him.
one random accusation hasn't crushed anyone.
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
cajun has a point
have fun so called freedom lover, you make up quotes and stances of mine anyway. add another fabrication, have fun with it
only big thing i can think of where someone was screwed by a single, unsubstantiated accusation was ezekiel elliott. but i don't even believe the NFL believed the woman, just think there was shadier stuff going on.
sturg33
I
sturg33
I
I mean... it just happened with Shiano.
There was so little evidence against him that they didn't even press charges. And yet, he's now been blacklisted from ever getting a head coaching job ever again.
We now auto-assume guilt. And if anyone doesn't defend that position, dumb**** goldy will accuse of being a child raper enabler.
McQueary testified to that tho, didn't he?
And who said Schiano will never get a HC job again? He still currently has a prestigious job right now, albeit not as a HC. If people don't want someone even mildly associated with that whole mess leading their big-time CFB team, then that's understandable.
You won't find many instances of one woman making an accusation against a man and everyone believing it. Due process is applicable when it comes to actual court, not the court of public opinion. I don't need Roy Moore to be confirmed guilty (in a trial that won't happen) to believe the many accusers. This idea that people are quick to auto-believe every accusation is off base. It ignores context and nuance.
who is "we"? who is being auto-assumed as guilty?
sturg33
I
Sounds like both parties are pieces of ****.
But hey, libertarians are unicorns, so let's keep voting them both in
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
Every time you suggest that voting for a fringy third party would magically fix things, you confirm the label.
57Brave
Well-known member
Pé Resists @4everNeverTrump
12h12 hours ago
To be clear: people who claim "women lie about rape to get money" literally paid a woman to lie about rape... #ProjectVeritas
sturg33
I
I don't suggest that.
What I do suggest is continuing to do the same thing over and over won't fix anything
i wouldn't call both parties the same on this issue, however. i do wish we could stop trying to make this a partisan issue at all. it's bad on both sides and both sides should be better at addressing it.
BedellBrave
It's OVER 5,000!
How about the novel idea of calling on them (those with credible accusations against them - Moore, Conyers, Francine, TrumP, etc.) all to hit the road? And when they don't, and party loyalists not pressuring them to do so, recognize it for what it is - enabling creeps for political "gain." And then the moral bankruptcy of the enablers...
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I predict every Republican not named Rand Paul will have sexual assault allegations made against them after they win the Republican nomination. Politics is a dirty business. Accusations real and false are going to be weaponized. There are a lot of people out there who want to do away with due process for men accuse of sex crimes. Any allegation is going to be considered fact by a sizeable chunk of voters.