What part of “playing it conservative for the first year” do folks not understand?
I was responding to the trade proposal dude had posted. Chill.
What part of “playing it conservative for the first year” do folks not understand?
I was responding to the trade proposal dude had posted. Chill.
Agree. But I prefer to do that now. I don't believe that Teheran nor Folty will build more value over the coming season than they will lose due to the loss of control time. And I see both as having less long term value than most of the young guys (those with real value) since they are getting older (Teheran especially) and more expensive with less control (Folty).
If we are below .500 at mid-season, I don't think AA will hesitate to make some moves of this type. I've always thought that mid-season was the best time to trade major leaguers for prospects. Contending teams pay more of a premium at that point. But if we get the right offer tomorrow, I'm open to trading anyone.
AA is going to make a play for Yelich if he's available. He'll play it conservative other than that would be my guess based on what's been reported so far.
I think it would be a bad move. Braves would have to pay a premium in young talent unless they are willing to take back a ton of bad contracts and I don't think that's on the table now after the Kemp deal.
That's the rub. Yelich would likely drain the Braves of young talent. We probably wouldn't have to trade Acuna or Albies. But it would likely start with Gohara and Wright/Soroka. And then likely Pache and Fried. That's a big price to pay. Is it worth it, possibly, but remember we lost tons of international money.
If the Braves are somehow in WC contention at the deadline, expect them to upgrade with a long term piece.
If they are out of contention, they will be looking to flip Teheran. Folty has enough control that he should be held.
The odds of them being in contention are not high. It will be a pretty slow offseason for the Braves from here on out. The Braves mouthpiece has already said as much.
It will be a pretty slow offseason for the Braves from here on out. The Braves mouthpiece has already said as much.
Yeah. We are pretty much done. I think we bring in a stopgap like Seth Smith to play left to help with the optics of sending Acuna down for a few weeks. And that might be it.
Why a LHer? I would think a RHer would make more sense so he could platoon with Markakis.
I wanted Austin Jackson last year, and I think a player like that would make sense again this year. Of course Lane Adams may be penciled in for exactly that role, but he is extremely unlikely to repeat his 2017 production.
Yeah. We are pretty much done. I think we bring in a stopgap like Seth Smith to play left to help with the optics of sending Acuna down for a few weeks. And that might be it.
yeah...a RH makes sense now that Kemp is gone...but I'm also thinking about when Acuna is up
I think it would be a bad move. Braves would have to pay a premium in young talent unless they are willing to take back a ton of bad contracts and I don't think that's on the table now after the Kemp deal.
If you are going to go Seth Smith why not do Preston Tucker instead, just designated by the stros and should be really cheap. Also, if you are going Lefty then Cargo might be your man or Granderson. If you want the novelty effect you could go with Ichiro.
RH you're looking at Austin Jackson, Cam Maybin. I guess you could go with Werth if he comes cheap enough.
You might bring in Eduardo Nunez to play 3B/LF/SS (probably the best bet).
Right, and then he platoons with Markakis.
I find it highly unlikely the Braves call up Acuna to platoon him with a Seth Smith type player.