I pay basically nothing in insurance these days thanks to my employer.
really?
there is a pretty big literature on the incidence of the costs of various employer provided benefits...you might want to take a look
your claim is akin to a Canadian saying...I pay basically nothing for medical care thanks to the government, what a deal
But the government isn't providing me my health care.
There's not a single scenario where my costs font go up in this scenario.
I pay basically nothing in insurance these days thanks to my employer. For some reason' I doubt I'll be exempt from the tax hike.
Oh! And my health care options will be substantially worse!
What a deal
Surely you must realize this.
Lol I obviously know that my employer benefits are not free.
What I also know is that I dont trust' like Mr. Sanders does, that I'll receive 100% of the health care costs as salary in M4A fairyland.
I also dont trust the government can do a better job of providing me great healthcare options like my employer can, which gives me about 12 options of different plans that I can choose from based on particular needs.
I also dont trust that our healthcare will be in better shape with M4A... as hospitals today currently cannot stay in business on medicare rates.
And there is no world in which I will get better or equal healthcare than I have now, for cheaper costs.
Brian Tyler Cohen
@briantylercohen
·
Oct 15
If your healthcare costs are $10,000 now
and your taxes are 25%, your total cost is $12,500.
If Medicare For All brings your costs down to $5,000
and your taxes up to 50%, your total cost is $7,500.
Taxes can go UP & total costs can go DOWN.
Don't take the GOP bait.
You're right to be skeptical about what Sanders and Warren are promising. But our medical care system is not perfect. There is lots of room for improvement. For reducing administrative costs. For removing perverse incentives.
I posted earlier about my doctor being startled when I asked for a cheaper generic statin. It didn't affect me since my insurance pays for either the more expensive or cheaper statins. The doctor billed the more expensive one. Maybe it is a little better. But mostly because he has a financial stake in doing this. That's perverse.
Our healthcare system is far from perfect because we have this awful hybrid model.
But I get annoyed when people want 1. Life saving cures. 2. Developed for free.
It doesnt work like that.
Public policy involves making choices. Some people may have an immature conception and think otherwise. But with respect to healthcare I think we have overincentived the development of expensive new treatments. I don't want progress in medical knowledge to stop. But I think we can reduce those incentives and find a better place for society as a whole.
I'm not willing to make that tradeoff of sacrificing innovative health care in favor of big brother government having more control over my life.
In order for M4A to become law would require at least 2 more years of debates , proposals,counter proposals, more discussion and more discussion.
Other ideas like nsa said
As opposed to the status quo. Where you as a 30ish in good health are not subject to insulin or epipens over charges.
Yet
Hate to bring it up again but your narrow view reminds me the saw "everyone is a Libertarian until their house is 10' under water"
In this case, looking down the barrel of out of control medical bills and uber inflated drug pricing.
Should you or your bride be diagnosed with a catastrophic disease, you trust your insurer to support you all the way through?
My 2nd hand experience says don't hold your breath
I have yet to hear proposals from you or the people that represent you at the table.
At this point Sen Sanders is kinda like the Phillies and Bryce Harper, bidding against himself
I promise you. I'll never adopt the mentality that my challenges will be the responsibility of others
It's a losers mentality