Today in Rand Paul

57Brave

57Brave

Well-known member
or what we call
The Little Engine That Could



Rand Paul: I really strongly believe that President Obama gave specific and direct oversight and direct permission for this...
Martha: Do you have evidence of that?
Paul:... I have a strong feeling..
 
Haha...you still don't believe it.

At this point you never will despite the overwhelming mountains of evidence.
 
Google shows Rand Paul as a Duke Alum and licensed ophthalmologist.
He is neither.

is Google bigger than "media"
hmmm
Deep Thoughts
 
cajunrevenge said:
Would you want an investigation if Biden openly asked China to find some of Trumps emails and the next day China started hacking to get it?
Click to expand...

I dunno. Maybe I'd support a 2 year independent investigation from highly respected Mr. Mueller and then accept the findings?
 
It wouldnt have been a 2 year investigation if thet did not obstruct it. Could have been cleared up in 3 months. Also Mueller is a lifelong Republican so we would need a Democrat equivalent. Beyond that do you think an investigation can exonerate a person when they obstruct the investigation in multiple ways?
 
ahh ok

I'm really glad we went through all of that. The left said Mueller was independent and that we'd respect the decision because it was a slam dunk

But, you know... that didn't happen
 
yeah but {AGConservative} said "the left said"
///////////////////////////////////

If one were to take the time to understand Muellers mandate and how the final days played out ...
Wish we had a Shakespeare scholar on board to put this into that context

Anyone ?
 
nsacpi said:
Hmmm...my recollection is that you thought Mueller's investigation was a witch hunt
Click to expand...

Look again.

I thought it was a waste of time. But that if he found evidence of wrong doing, I'd support it.

You were the one blabbering about german bombshells
 
sturg33 said:
Look again.

I thought it was a waste of time. But that if he found evidence of wrong doing, I'd support it.

You were the one blabbering about german bombshells
Click to expand...
No. You said it was a witch hunt with frequent complaints about how much money was being wasted.
 
sturg33 said:
Look again.

I thought it was a waste of time. But that if he found evidence of wrong doing, I'd support it.

You were the one blabbering about german bombshells
Click to expand...

and whatever wrong doing that came to light you have contested.
Because, {AGConservative} or Jack Probastic or whatever contested it.

Understand Mueller's mandate and the legal constraints to his investigation, read his congressional testimony and look at the record.

This reminds me of people of both parties not understanding that Obama was/is a pragmatic centrist rather than a Left Wing ideologue
because a) that is/was what they wanted to think and b) that is what the internet told them
////////////////

I am sure Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, the 12 Russians, Manaforts #2, the Riussian woman that was in jail for ~ a year etc etc etc

But hey, those were all all Obama's scalps
 
Last edited:
that seems your stock answer when you are challenged or shown the obvious

Read Mueller and not the internet
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top