They also are one the quickest positions to decline too.
True but that wasn't really the argument that was being made by Zito.
They also are one the quickest positions to decline too.
What site are you looking at for your info?
BR says he went from 23% in 2012 to 30% in 2013.
True but that wasn't really the argument that was being made by Zito.
But1b generally take longer to develop do they not? Can't find the website at this time, but I remember reading that
No. Players at power positions tend to debut later because of talented hitters already at their position.
The article dicusses why peak has basically gone away. Gone are the days of players having ****ty diets and exercising routines in the minors. Players are groomed for the majors now, they're coming in in great shape with great diet and exercise, they're facing better talent in the minors, and so on so forth. That's what's been going on. That's why you're seeing so many legendary debuts like Trout or Jason. Cause players are ready. Obviously no player is the same, so they have different aging curves, but in general the expectation of players getting better as they hit their late 20s is likely gonna break many people's hearts in the upcoming seasons.
I'm not convinced by the latest research from Fangraphs on the lack of an aging curve. The way I see the data (and here I'm only talking about hitters) is if you slice hitters into groups by some metric (OPS or wRC+ or whatever). And then further divide up the groups by those above a certain age and those below, you will find that for about 80-90% of the hitters it looks likes performance is a random walk from one year to the next and is unrelated to age. But at the tails (players who improve a lot, and players who drop off a lot) you definitely find significantly more young players in one group and significantly more old players in the other group. Imo the best type of player to invest in is the good but not elite hitter under age 27.
I'm not really sure where you're going there.
Players have generally followed a trend. Of course generally doesn't mean every player does it. In the past they debuted then got way better then aged. Now they're debuting strong and not improving as much. They age at about the same curve minus some steroid blips.
I'm not really sure where you're going there.
Players have generally followed a trend. Of course generally doesn't mean every player does it. In the past they debuted then got way better then aged. Now they're debuting strong and not improving as much. They age at about the same curve minus some steroid blips.
My point is there are more marginal young players getting significant playing time in the majors now. They are there mostly in reaction to how expensive older players have gotten. Their aging curve is not the same as the better young players.
Fair point but why wouldn't the marginal players also improve?
Well, I think batting leadoff is a good place for Jason. It probably simplifies his approach some and utilizes his speed and good eye.
Freddie Freeman and Paul Goldschmidt - The New 1B Royalty
Freddie may not be able to sustain a .370 BABIP, but his batted ball profile suggests that he will still have a high BABIP and not fall off to league average levels.
Man that triple negative in the last paragraph was painful to read.
Bottom line – neither Freeman nor Goldschmidt may not be the next Joey Votto, or Murray or Olerud or Helton.