goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
I don't think he owns the sole rights on that, LOL
No **** Sherlock
Thanks for stopping by though
I don't think he owns the sole rights on that, LOL
Oh right I now recall you saying those small businesses would have closed anyway
Glad you're a Walmart fan now lol
No **** Sherlock
Thanks for stopping by though
The whole point is to compare unvaccinated/non-natural immunity to vaccinated/non-natural immunity. The efficacy rates of both study groups in anything you quote are materially different when you bifurcate to four groups.
No, the whole point is to compare vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. So long as there's not something wacky going on, the rate of natural immunity on each side will balance out. This allows the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated groups to be accurately compared and any difference in Covid rates can be reliably attributed to the vaccine.
The only way the stats showing unvaccinated are 5 times more likely to contract Covid than unvaccinated can be skewed by prior infection numbers is if there is a significantly higher percentage of vaccinated individuals with prior infections than unvaccinated. If they're similar than the 5 times figure holds up and can be attributed to the effectiveness of the vaccine.
[tw]1462872153079099403[/tw]
Need to completely change the concept of what is the 'press' in this country.
Should hold MSNBC/NYT/WAPO/CNN accountable for these lives and the political violence that took place in 2020.
They are trying to overthrow the United States.
They 100% should be. Retractions should come with a LARGE fine
Because its baking in a positive efficacy in the vaccinated population that has nothing to do with vaccination. If a study doesn't have 4 clearly defined populations then its almost irrelevant.
The Tony Stark's Holmes or the Benedict Cumberbatch one?
[tw]1462872153079099403[/tw]
Need to completely change the concept of what is the 'press' in this country.
Should hold MSNBC/NYT/WAPO/CNN accountable for these lives and the political violence that took place in 2020.
They are trying to overthrow the United States.
Isn't it weird that Assange is a criminal and Soros is a philanthropist?
Isn't it weird that Assange is a criminal and Soros is a philanthropist?
They 100% should be. Retractions should come with a LARGE fine
[tw]1462872153079099403[/tw]
Need to completely change the concept of what is the 'press' in this country.
Should hold MSNBC/NYT/WAPO/CNN accountable for these lives and the political violence that took place in 2020.
They are trying to overthrow the United States.