Search results

Whoa, is this THE ChapelHillMatt?

Depends on what Kim wants. If it’s $15m it’s a no-brainer for me. But I think Boras is holding out for more. My gut says he’ll be back.

No idea if he can play SS. I don’t love hitters like him.

You just don’t understand leverage or something

Yeah I really don’t want to watch AA do sex…that sex tape would have negative value in my book.

Negative value doesn’t mean negative value, you absolute dense moron.

Yes, it is definitely my fault that you said something you apparently didn’t mean lol. Do whatever you feel you need to do in order to make yourself feel better for being wrong. No harm to me. But it still has zero bearing on you being wrong here.

…players don’t have leverage in a free agent market? Again, complete and total nonsense. Your brain is a pretzel.

Sure, if that makes you feel better I guess. Can you answer the question I’ve asked a bunch of times?

What you’re saying is complete nonsense.

Could Murphy fetch a 40 prospect or not? Have you answered that question yet?

Twisting themselves into pretzels to somehow claim Murphy has negative trade value due to his 3/$45 contract. Wild.

Yes, teams famously don’t need players during free agency.

This has positively nothing to do with his trade value. Your confusion is mounting.

When you said he had negative trade value, I assumed you were saying he had negative trade value. My bad. Not sure how I mixed that up.

So you just don’t know what the word “negative” means. Got it.

So they are simultaneously willing to pay him that contract but also unwilling because…reasons. Got it. Makes total sense. Of course, Correa is another poor comparison because he’s making over 2x what Murphy makes.

Lol claiming off waivers is exactly the same as paying them that contract as a FA…the refusal to admit that saying Murphy has negative value is dumb is leading some into the most illogical conclusions.

I am not in favor of trading players at their lowest value. I’m not sure who said he has great trade value but I guess it’s straw man time of the discussion. Non-negative trade value != great trade value, just to be clear. I think he’ll be more valuable to the Braves than whatever they’d get...

And even still, if a team is willing to give up a prospect for him, guess what? That means he doesn’t have negative value.