Lot of chatter this am on MLB XM about the Braves and Giants discussing MadBum..... would take one of wright/gohara/soroka/touki + ...
XM radio...enough said
Lot of chatter this am on MLB XM about the Braves and Giants discussing MadBum..... would take one of wright/gohara/soroka/touki + ...
Lot of chatter this am on MLB XM about the Braves and Giants discussing MadBum..... would take one of wright/gohara/soroka/touki + ...
Lot of chatter this am on MLB XM about the Braves and Giants discussing MadBum..... would take one of wright/gohara/soroka/touki + ...
Absolutely horrible idea at that price-level.
Lot of chatter this am on MLB XM about the Braves and Giants discussing MadBum..... would take one of wright/gohara/soroka/touki + ...
Absolutely horrible idea at that price-level.
I wouldn't disagree, but everyone that has talked-down potential Bumgarner trades has to take a bit of a step back and realize the situation on their end. We're talking about a guy who's a bigger part of Giants' history than Chipper is of Braves' history. Their ask from Milwaukee is one of Burnes, Woodruff, or Peralta plus, so it's not like they're aiming higher just because it's our system.
I understand the hesitation (and don't think I'd give up one of those guys either without assurances an extension would be an easy negotiation), but ask yourself what it would've taken to get the Braves to trade Chipper in the last year of his deal. I can't imagine what kind of grief the front office would have gotten from the fans if they'd have traded him for a couple second-tier prospects - how quickly folks forget how badly the Murphy trade worked out from a PR standpoint as well as return standpoint is pretty funny at times.
I wouldn't disagree, but everyone that has talked-down potential Bumgarner trades has to take a bit of a step back and realize the situation on their end. We're talking about a guy who's a bigger part of Giants' history than Chipper is of Braves' history. Their ask from Milwaukee is one of Burnes, Woodruff, or Peralta plus, so it's not like they're aiming higher just because it's our system.
I understand the hesitation (and don't think I'd give up one of those guys either without assurances an extension would be an easy negotiation), but ask yourself what it would've taken to get the Braves to trade Chipper in the last year of his deal. I can't imagine what kind of grief the front office would have gotten from the fans if they'd have traded him for a couple second-tier prospects - how quickly folks forget how badly the Murphy trade worked out from a PR standpoint as well as return standpoint is pretty funny at times.
Lot of chatter this am on MLB XM about the Braves and Giants discussing MadBum..... would take one of wright/gohara/soroka/touki + ...
Lot of chatter this am on MLB XM about the Braves and Giants discussing MadBum..... would take one of wright/gohara/soroka/touki + ...
I wouldn't disagree, but everyone that has talked-down potential Bumgarner trades has to take a bit of a step back and realize the situation on their end. We're talking about a guy who's a bigger part of Giants' history than Chipper is of Braves' history. Their ask from Milwaukee is one of Burnes, Woodruff, or Peralta plus, so it's not like they're aiming higher just because it's our system.
I understand the hesitation (and don't think I'd give up one of those guys either without assurances an extension would be an easy negotiation), but ask yourself what it would've taken to get the Braves to trade Chipper in the last year of his deal. I can't imagine what kind of grief the front office would have gotten from the fans if they'd have traded him for a couple second-tier prospects - how quickly folks forget how badly the Murphy trade worked out from a PR standpoint as well as return standpoint is pretty funny at times.
I wouldn't disagree, but everyone that has talked-down potential Bumgarner trades has to take a bit of a step back and realize the situation on their end. We're talking about a guy who's a bigger part of Giants' history than Chipper is of Braves' history. Their ask from Milwaukee is one of Burnes, Woodruff, or Peralta plus, so it's not like they're aiming higher just because it's our system.
I understand the hesitation (and don't think I'd give up one of those guys either without assurances an extension would be an easy negotiation), but ask yourself what it would've taken to get the Braves to trade Chipper in the last year of his deal. I can't imagine what kind of grief the front office would have gotten from the fans if they'd have traded him for a couple second-tier prospects - how quickly folks forget how badly the Murphy trade worked out from a PR standpoint as well as return standpoint is pretty funny at times.
Your response doesn't really address the issue.
the Giants certainly might have a difficult time trading Bumgarner without a big return, but why does that suggest the Braves should pay it?
A reasonable Bumgarner deal is for a much more minor prospect than Soroka, Gohara, Touki, Wright. Unless the Giants are going to address some other hole of the Braves somehow none of those guys should be on the table for one year of control of Bumgarner.
Also saw where Boston isn’t gonna spend much for a closer so Kimbrel going back there isn’t likely. How low would his price have to go for AA to be interested?