I'd easily do Riley/Anderson/Wentz for Haniger
Saw this from USA Today, projected standings. NL East seems about right, i think the top 4 teams beat up on each other a good bit.
![]()
Man Baltimore is gonna be super awful for awhile now. A team devoid of MLB talent and a middling farm system. Even with the No.1 pick, I highly doubt they will be even mildly competitive for the next year's.
Everyone wants to trade Ender for some reason.
His next 3 years are 7.7, 8 and team option for 9 mil. Thats very team friendly for a 3 WAR player, and one whose dependable. Worse comes to worse, he could be the 4th outfielder if you upgraded in one of the other spots, and Pache developed, or Waters took the minors by storm.
Pass on Keuchel imo.
Saw this from USA Today, projected standings. NL East seems about right, i think the top 4 teams beat up on each other a good bit.
![]()
we will not be looking into acquiring an OF for this year. markakis is that guy. he's not going to be a 4th OFer. that dream is dead.
Where did you read anything about Markakis being a 4th OF???
we will not be looking into acquiring an OF for this year. markakis is that guy. he's not going to be a 4th OFer. that dream is dead.
I didn't.
my point is that acquiring haniger this year would push markakis to be the 4th OF. that's not going to happen.
There's no way I'd peg the Braves as an 89-win team until I see Donaldson and Dansby on the field for at least 5 straight days. At this point, I wouldn't even overburden them with high expectations of being a .500 team until Donaldson at least gets ONE AB.
Moving Nick to the bench wouldnt be bad, no? But unless the M's start out awful like 10-30, hard to see them selling that early.
of course it wouldn't be bad. i'm not against it. i'm just saying it won't happen. they didn't sign him to be the 4th OF.
I didn't.
my point is that acquiring haniger this year would push markakis to be the 4th OF. that's not going to happen.
Acquiring Haniger or not acquiring Haniger has nothing to do with Nick Markakis.
i mean, keep telling yourself that. we probably would not have acquired him anyway. now they won't even be looking to unless nick tanks or there's a major injury. markakis was signed to be at worst a starter as part of a platoon. there is no circumstance outside of injury where they would have ponied up the cost for haniger after signing markakis.
The Ms aren't keeping Haniger to compete this year, so their 2019 record is completely inconsequential.
They appear to be keeping him as a cornerstone 2 years from now. Is that a smart move for a guy currently going into his age 28 season? Probably not, but it's the direction they seem to be taking.
Haniger isn't in Atlanta because the Mariners don't really want to trade him and the Braves don't really want to give up prospects. Not that I'm really all that sure that the Braves have ever particularly targeted him as something they are dying to have.
Markakis isn't preventing the Braves from doing anything. they let him twist in the wind until his ask came down to backup money. That's not the action of a front office in love.