There's nothing worse than a guy who wants to dish it out, but can't accept being wrong.
'Yes, I was wrong. But, you see, he ended up being better than I thought he would be. So...I wasn't actually wrong. You get it.'
There's nothing worse than a guy who wants to dish it out, but can't accept being wrong.
I predicted Acuna to be able to sustain a .340 BABIP in the majors. You called me a moron for that. You were wrong.
Last I checked this is the same FO that let Nick play 162 last year, all the while playing horribly for the entire 2nd half of the season. What's changed since September?
I have no doubts that Camargo and Duvall will play a decent amount, even though I seem to remember that the Camargo playing OF statement was made prior to resigning Nick, but I still expect Nick to cruise past 100 games played and not reach 1.5 WAR.
No doubt, we absolutely could have cashed in some chips and made more improvements. The question is always (especially so for a team with the financial reality the Braves are in) how much to cash in now and how much to protect for the future. No one has the answer to that on the front end, so everything is a bit of a guessing game and involves risk. Anyone who pretends differently is insane.
If you cash them all in, you're probably going to be screwed longterm. If you don't cash any in, you're probably not going to win as many games in the short-term and may never fully get off the ground into competing territory. So you're balancing somewhere in the middle. But just because we didn't cash in many chips doesn't mean the FO believes we are rebuilding. It means they've decided that based on our options, we were better off being conservative now to hopefully have more reinforcements later.
We still have those pieces that we could cash in at the trade deadline...we could still make a move before the season...we could have some of those guys ready to help out in 2019...there are plenty of scenarios where holding onto pieces does not equal a rebuild.
I think Camargo will get a ton of PA. Whether it's 450 or 550, I don't really know. But he'll probably get about 50 starts just between Donaldson and Dansby being banged up or sitting. Markakis may get more rest this year than he's used to. And if Camargo keeps playing well enough, he'll force himself into a spot somewhere in the lineup on a daily basis.
Can't really see why ownership would have objected to overpaying in prospects for Realmuto.
Would not have exploded the payroll and would have made fans happy.
I'm shaking.
You think they would have a guy who averages around 90 on his fastball anywhere in the top 100?
They traded for Duvall at the deadline, which suggests they believed Neck wasn't likely to maintain his performance/stay healthy and wanted some insurance. Also not a coincidence that they targeted a RHH.
Unfortunately, Duvall fell flat on his face.
They traded for Duvall at the deadline, which suggests they believed Neck wasn't likely to maintain his performance/stay healthy and wanted some insurance. Also not a coincidence that they targeted a RHH.
Unfortunately, Duvall fell flat on his face.
Let's start with your defense of Allard way back in 2017 when i said he wasn't going to be good haha.
http://www.chopcountry.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7306&page=2&p=424928&viewfull=1#post424928
So...what are your thoughts on Allard now, hero? Is this helping you build your resume for admittance into the Twits?
This is going to be fun!
What'd he say in 1999?
If you had to go back that far, he must have a good record. I'm sure I post something stupid daily or at least weekly
What'd he say in 1999?
If you had to go back that far, he must have a good record. I'm sure I post something stupid daily or at least weekly
You are from Mississippi so we grade your comments on a curve and it slides up to just dumb. Not stupid.
They traded for Duvall at the deadline, which suggests they believed Neck wasn't likely to maintain his performance/stay healthy and wanted some insurance. Also not a coincidence that they targeted a RHH.
Unfortunately, Duvall fell flat on his face.
Here's my honest opinion:
Obviously a lot will depend on Donaldson's health. If he can be Josh from two-three year ago, then we have three legit MVP candidates in JD, Freeman and Acuna. Albies should again be an all star candidate. Ender hopefully bounces back to being an above average hitter. Catcher should come in at about league average. RF and SS will be below average to bad, I'm afraid. Swanson REALLY needs to break out for us to have a chance.
So that means 3 elites, 1 pretty damn good, one fairly good to average, one average and two below average to bad.
Seeing the moves that the Nats, Mets and Phillies have made so far (which doesn't count that one of Harper/Machado or both come to the East), I think we have the 3rd best offense in the East. Our pitching staff will likely be worse than the 12th best that they were last year (if we don't sign anyone), which puts them squarely at league average to slightly below average. The defense is top 5. Bullpen should be slightly above average if Minter / Viz can lock up the 9th fairly well. Hard to know how good Camargo will be in an uncertain role compared to what we got out of Charlie and the rest of the bench last year, but you can consider the bench to have an upgrade.
I think we'll win around 80 games and be in competition for the final wild card spot, but missing by a few games. So a fringe playoff contender, finishing 3rd in the East.
Who is the favorite for Harper now? If padres get him, do they trade Myers or renfroe? If nats get him, do they trade Eaton? Would we interested in any of these guys?
I still think it's the Phillies. Although it's possible they shifted to JTR if they know they are out on him.
Let's start with your defense of Allard way back in 2017 when i said he wasn't going to be good haha.
http://www.chopcountry.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7306&page=2&p=424928&viewfull=1#post424928
So...what are your thoughts on Allard now, hero? Is this helping you build your resume for admittance into the Twits?
This is going to be fun!
Why is so much time spent arguing about whether someone was right or wrong in past opinion based statements made about a local sports team?