2020 Field

Omg I thought this rational was resigned to the 57s of the world, not potential Presidents

[Tw]1138551389783810049[/tw]
 
you should close the laptop and get out --- meet some people --

do volunteer work at a homeless shelter or perhaps escort women to PP.
Coach LL baseball or get involved with people not of your world

talk to someone besides "Will" and thethe
 
Jessica Cisneros for Congress
‏ @JCisnerosTX

When my parents came to the US from Mexico, my dad ran a trucking business and my mom took care of me and my sister.

They never imagined that their daughter would be running for Congress to fight for families like ours.

South Texas deserves a Democrat who shares our values.


D88OdpFWkAAZ-Xi.jpg
 
"Because if there’s anything that really affects voters going into 2020, it’s Hillary Clinton’s emails. Trump returned to the critical subject of Clinton at least seven times during the speech, including breaking out a Hillary imitation as wincingly awful as every other Trump imitation."
 
Its important to keep bringing it up because it shows just how 'fair' the justice system rules are. The country has been at each others throats about obstruction while the actual destruction of evidence under subpoena never got the same attention. Why is that?

So, while you think its irrelevant it strengthens the case in Trumps base and potential future independent voters that this whole concept of obstruction was a sham because its selectively applied based on your political/ideological affiliation.
 
" no collusion - no obstruction "
what happened, what did I miss ?
...............................................

this is the oddest form of exoneration
 
Its important to keep bringing it up because it shows just how 'fair' the justice system rules are. The country has been at each others throats about obstruction while the actual destruction of evidence under subpoena never got the same attention. Why is that?

So, while you think its irrelevant it strengthens the case in Trumps base and potential future independent voters that this whole concept of obstruction was a sham because its selectively applied based on your political/ideological affiliation.

HRC is without a doubt the most investigated person in the history of US.
Going back to the late 1980's in Arkansas
I would love to see even one indictment -
all we got was 11 hours of testimony
...........

you assigned the thought of "irrelevant" - no doubt the Freudian implications escape you
/////////////////////

I have no earthly idea whether Trump is re elected or not.
But this is a strange way to kick off a POTUS re election campaign.
 
HRC is without a doubt the most investigated person in the history of US.
Going back to the late 1980's in Arkansas
I would love to see even one indictment -
all we got was 11 hours of testimony
...........

you assigned the thought of "irrelevant" - no doubt the Freudian implications escape you
/////////////////////

I have no earthly idea whether Trump is re elected or not.
But this is a strange way to kick off a POTUS re election campaign.

Did she destroy evidence that was under subpoena?
 
2019 and y'all still talking about hillary emails and benghazi and screaming lock her up at these propaganda rallies

and somehow have the audacity to say the left lost their minds lol
 
Did she destroy evidence that was under subpoena?

apparently not according to the Trump,Bush43,Bush41 and the Arkansas GOP justice departments.
Or the Gingrich,Boehner or Hastert House committees

Which begs the question, what does Trump have on the history books to justify re-election ?

At least Bush43 fought the junk calls at dinner time.
Not sure what Trump has to show for his 2+ years
 
apparently not according to the Trump,Bush43,Bush41 and the Arkansas GOP justice departments.
Or the Gingrich,Boehner or Hastert House committees

Which begs the question, what does Trump have on the history books to justify re-election ?

At least Bush43 fought the junk calls at dinner time.
Not sure what Trump has to show for his 2+ years

No - That is not their claim. She was not charged with a crime but she absolutely destroyed evidence under subpoena. This is not a debatable fact.
 
are you saying she was exonerated ?

if she broke the law she would have been charged at least once over the 35 years she has been in the public sphere
Especially over the kurffle made over , fer chrise sakes, the emails.
Then perhaps there wasn't a crime to be charged , or one of the many congressional committees that has looked into it would have suggested to the Trump DOJ to pursue indictment. To the best of my and everyone's knowledge that has not been the case.
Perhaps she was, exonerated !!!



All Trump has to show for his 2 1/2 years is a debt to Russia for giving him the keys to the White House. A disasterous foreign policy where Iran is again enriching uranium , a string of for profitconcentration camps all along our southern border and a first edition book ,

But, you and sturg got a tax cut
 
Last edited:
This is 2019 not 2015-16. Try real hard to stay focused

HRC isn't running, she is a Grandmother on Long Island.
Hey, she is fighting MS-13 just like you
 
Maybe thethe should be asking the OG AG William Barr why he hasnt charged Hillary with a crime if its indisputable. Sessios and Barr are about as biased Right Wing hacks as you ever find and neither even sniffed charging Hillary. I just dont understand how you think Trump is exonerated but Hillary isnt. She atleast testified in person under oath for like 100 hours. Trump couldnt do that for 5 minutes without committing perjury and you know it.
 
Maybe thethe should be asking the OG AG William Barr why he hasnt charged Hillary with a crime if its indisputable. Sessios and Barr are about as biased Right Wing hacks as you ever find and neither even sniffed charging Hillary. I just dont understand how you think Trump is exonerated but Hillary isnt. She atleast testified in person under oath for like 100 hours. Trump couldnt do that for 5 minutes without committing perjury and you know it.

Trump just didn't get the regular exoneration. He got the complete and total exoneration works.
 
Maybe thethe should be asking the OG AG William Barr why he hasnt charged Hillary with a crime if its indisputable. Sessios and Barr are about as biased Right Wing hacks as you ever find and neither even sniffed charging Hillary. I just dont understand how you think Trump is exonerated but Hillary isnt. She atleast testified in person under oath for like 100 hours. Trump couldnt do that for 5 minutes without committing perjury and you know it.

Barr has much bigger fish to fry.

You know - The small thing of using the national security apparatus to spy on an opposing campaign. The little things...
 
Barr has much bigger fish to fry.

You know - The small thing of using the national security apparatus to spy on an opposing campaign. The little things...

I mean if Hillary and Obama were in cahoots as members of the Deep State then it's a no-brainer.
 
are you saying she was exonerated ?

if she broke the law she would have been charged at least once over the 35 years she has been in the public sphere
Especially over the kurffle made over , fer chrise sakes, the emails.
Then perhaps there wasn't a crime to be charged , or one of the many congressional committees that has looked into it would have suggested to the Trump DOJ to pursue indictment. To the best of my and everyone's knowledge that has not been the case.
Perhaps she was, exonerated !!!



All Trump has to show for his 2 1/2 years is a debt to Russia for giving him the keys to the White House. A disasterous foreign policy where Iran is again enriching uranium , a string of for profitconcentration camps all along our southern border and a first edition book ,

But, you and sturg got a tax cut

Haha - Ignore the economy/Strength against China/Isis/deportation of harden criminals/bringing attention to the American people how pathetic the Dems are on immigration.

But hey - you got to feel 'good' under the Obama presidency.
 
Back
Top