2024 Field

[tw]1816844195430056447[/tw]

Her record is so bad - The media blitz is too far away from election day to make a difference.
 
[tw]1816886828613439745[/tw]

I would continue to push this message - **** the cat ladies who vote democrats 99% of the time.

Family culture is the only thing that will save this country.
 
Carp said:
Obviously someone cares, or they wouldn't be going through the trouble of concealing information.

You just don't get it Zito. It has nothing to do with the actual candidate or their historical policy, as bad as it may be.. It has everything to do with the unethical (and potentially illegal, if Trump's hush money trial is any indication) concealing of public information in support of a political candidate during an election.

News outlets are editing articles from years ago to spin a new narrative about her. Historical data that was available a few short years (hell it might have been available a month ago for all we know) is now conveniently unavailable. Again, an example of the Dems calling for "saving the democracy" while simultaneously doing the exact things the are charging Trump for.

Projecting at it's finest.
Click to expand...

Lol wut? I can still find articles from 2019/2020 talking about her convictions. Maybe you know, you just googled the wrong thing.
 
"Oh, it's no big deal the media is intentionally lying to us because the articles are archived anyway." lol

****ing liberals.
 
Very impressive the way the Dems rolled Harris out. She and they were prepared and had a game plan, unlike team Orange. But one thing the Dems did not see coming is how quickly the support for her could be amassed. The news of new voters registering in record numbers is shocking. Is it fair to think that new registrations after her announcement will be voting for her?
 
Last edited:
chop2chip said:
How funny for something that’s not true
Click to expand...

Yeah. JD was never sexually attracted to a sofa (he just went through a purple patch as a writer when musing about one). But I want to clarify that it wouldn't make him a bad person if he was. We need to respect the differences among us. For example, if someone wants to be called by a different name, that's cool with me. That's why to me he is JD Vance. Not J.D. Vance. Or James David Vance. Or James Donald Vance. Or James David Bowman. Or James Donald Bowman. Or James David Hamel. People sometimes go through a search for identity and evolve. And if they want to be called by a different name I try to respect that. Young people especially go through phases where they want to be something new. But this can carry over into adulthood. Sometimes we grow a beard. Or shave one off. Or decide that someone we once thought was despicable and a menace is the right person to emulate and follow. It's all good. Life is a journey.
 
Last edited:
Yup. And sometimes we chemically castrate ourselves or chop off breasts.

We must respect these things that are irreversible

- Mr academic
 
mqt said:
Yeah, I know it’s kind of dangerous to embrace a joke turning into active disinformation, but the jokes have been immaculate.
Click to expand...

The next few months will be couch ****ing and Kamala cackling and ear tampon jokes. Some kind of democracy we built for ourselves
 
We Marxists are proud to see a fellow Commie cock-suck her way to the top.

Cock-sucking Kamala all the way baby.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top