bravesfanMatt
Steve Harvey'd
I am hoping AA sees this and pulls the trigger.With so many teams needing SP help, I can't but think that Holmes would likely bring back a pretty substantial piece.
I am hoping AA sees this and pulls the trigger.With so many teams needing SP help, I can't but think that Holmes would likely bring back a pretty substantial piece.
Looks like two lottery tickets going to Baltimore, which is only appropriate because Soto is a lottery ticket every time he takes the mound. Did the Orioles have to throw in some money to pay for the seamstress' costs resulting from the Mets having to add initials to the two Soto's uniforms?
I think Holmes could be a valuable piece for a playoff team. He's not top drawer, but he could be used as a starter or multi-inning reliever.I am hoping AA sees this and pulls the trigger.
Oh man it’s almost as if conversations can have *nuance*.Someone says AA has been terrible lately, and you guys jump in to defend him by pointing out the injuries have been rough, as if that somehow excuses him being terrible. The point "many SPs got injured" isn't even counter to the statement "AA has been terrible", so why even bring it up other than to be argumentative?
Then carrying on for pages is what I would call bending over backwards. AA has been terrible, period. No amount of discussion over injuries changes that fact.
his cheap control is what makes him most valuable. but his cheap control is why I don't think AA is going to move him..I think Holmes could be a valuable piece for a playoff team. He's not top drawer, but he could be used as a starter or multi-inning reliever.
It's not really "giving up" on him.I kind of feel like Holmes is still a work in progress. He has swing and miss stuff but he needs to work on sequencing. No reason to give up on him.
Saw a suggestion of RIggy and Nacho for Turang. He has played 22 MLB games at SS.
What think you all?
Laureano was really good for the Braves last year when they needed it, and has a history of being a solid 4th outfielder/platoon player. The Braves knew they needed at least two outfielders with Acuña set to miss half the season. Not tendering him a contract for chump change was idiotic unless he was going to land a bigger fish, and many of us said as much at the time.I didn't realize that Laureano was having such a solid season, but he may be on his way to the highest bWAR of his career.
As for Anthopoulos, he built this team for the Acuna window by assuming that signing almost the entire offense to extensions would assure success. No question the Braves have been hit hard by injuries, but the extensions in total (as I've written before, each extension standing on its own has merit, but it's the aggregation that causes problems) have limited payroll flexibility and the ability to make changes on the fly. Drafting has probably been a solid "B" but that's mostly been with pitching outside of Harris and Baldwin (and half a point for Langeliers). I guess what I'm trying to say is that Anthopoulos went "in for a penny in for a pound" when he built the squad post-2021 and because of many of these decisions, we are stuck with what we have.
I can only assume AA was angling for a different move and it didn't work out (like may be Kyle Tucker). There was zero reason to dump Laureano just to sign Profar.Laureano was really good for the Braves last year when they needed it, and has a history of being a solid 4th outfielder/platoon player. The Braves knew they needed at least two outfielders with Acuña set to miss half the season. Not tendering him a contract for chump change was idiotic unless he was going to land a bigger fish, and many of us said as much at the time.
I agree. I think he had other plans that didn't work out so he pivotedI can only assume AA was angling for a different move and it didn't work out (like may be Kyle Tucker). There was zero reason to dump Laureano just to sign Profar.
Nobody has claimed he's been good. As usual, the discussion can't seem to stay on point.I've skipped the entire argument but is there someone saying AA has been good over the last year and a half at least? I will humbly accept flames for my thought, but AA has been mid to less over that span. So say, GM's aren't perfect. I get that, but injuries aside, the flaws of shopping in the bargain bins just in case of said injuries is and was a "hope" strategy. It's been that way for a couple of years. There's nothing wrong with calling that out even if you're an AA apologist, fan, supporter or whatever.
Yes, it was all part of his terrible off season. Laureano is exactly the type of OF bat this team should have on the bench, especially with Acuna starting out on the DL and a question mark after that.I can only assume AA was angling for a different move and it didn't work out (like may be Kyle Tucker). There was zero reason to dump Laureano just to sign Profar.
Yes. When someone comes along saying our pitching depth has been crap since 2021 they are going to get roasted. I'm sorry if that offends you.Someone says AA has been terrible lately, and you guys jump in to defend him by pointing out the injuries have been rough, as if that somehow excuses him being terrible. The point "many SPs got injured" isn't even counter to the statement "AA has been terrible", so why even bring it up other than to be argumentative?
Then carrying on for pages is what I would call bending over backwards. AA has been terrible, period. No amount of discussion over injuries changes that fact.
Going to the Rockies.