Around the League - 2021 Szn

He's somewhere between a 4 and 4.5 ERA guy if you just discard last year's disaster entirely. And he's declining with attendant health concerns.

Why would you want to pay him a lot of money?

Confidence knowing I'll have 200 IP at a middle of the rotation type effectiveness. All his injuries were flukes. Guy is a 2 WAR pitcher right now as a floor based on what I'm seeing. I'm also not sure why you think his range is 4-4.5 unless you think he degrades this offseason.

In terms of hard contact this is a listing of pitchers that have worse barrels per PA than Bumgarner:

Cole
Scherzer
Berrios
Taillon
Ian Anderson

He scores even better when you look at barrels per contact.

Can you elaborate on what you mean by 'attendant health concerns'?
 
Last edited:
He's somewhere between a 4 and 4.5 ERA guy if you just discard last year's disaster entirely. And he's declining with attendant health concerns.

Why would you want to pay him a lot of money?

When you already have pitchers that imo are just as good at this point in Ynoa and Touki to be 4/5 starters.
Not to mention the fact you have a chance at upside instead of the continuing decline of Bum.
 
When you already have pitchers that imo are just as good at this point in Ynoa and Touki to be 4/5 starters.
Not to mention the fact you have a chance at upside instead of the continuing decline of Bum.

You need 8 starting pitchers for a full season...at least.
 
Baumgardner in a vacuum isn't a bad option. But his current salary and length of deal is what's to be avoided. Those types need to be signed to 1 year deals like Smyly. Smyly was ass for the 1st month but has been pretty much what you would expect/want since then. As long as that continues through the end of the season then I have no issues with what he's done for the team despite the rough start.
 
Confidence knowing I'll have 200 IP at a middle of the rotation type effectiveness. All his injuries were flukes. Guy is a 2 WAR pitcher right now as a floor based on what I'm seeing. I'm also not sure why you think his range is 4-4.5 unless you think he degrades this offseason.

In terms of hard contact this is a listing of pitchers that have worse barrels per PA than Bumgarner:

Cole
Scherzer
Berrios
Taillon
Ian Anderson

He scores even better when you look at barrels per contact.

Can you elaborate on what you mean by 'attendant health concerns'?

Well, he has a 4.06 ERA and a 4.06 FIP.

His FIP the last five years: 3.95, 3.99, 3.90, 7.18, 4.06.

He will have reached 200 IP once in his last 4 full seasons at the end of this year.

Older pitchers tend to miss starts: see previous seasons.

You tell me he's our 4-5 starter that's fine production wise but bad money and years.
 
Last edited:
AA spent 26 million on starting pitching additions in the offseason and has gotten 3.8 fWAR out of it so far. Can't really complain too much about that.
 
Savant has him about as dead average as you can be.

Bottom quartile Ks balanced by top quartile BBs, lots of 40-60th percentile entries.

He's an average pitcher in decline with a much better pitcher's deal.

Nothing wrong with him eating innings but not at that price.
 
Well, he has a 4.06 ERA and a 4.06 FIP.

His FIP the last five years: 3.95, 3.99, 3.90, 7.18, 4.06.

He will have reached 200 IP once in his last 4 full seasons at the end of this year.

Older pitchers tend to miss starts: see previous seasons.

You tell me he's our 4-5 starter that's fine production wise but bad money and years.

You don't think his fluke injuries had to do with those sub 200IP seasons?

Come on man - Guy is clearly still a 180-200 IP almost guaranteed.

He would produce what his contract is worth and he will do that over the span of the deal. If a guy like Smyly is worth it at 11 then Bumgarner is WELL WORTH IT at 17.
 
Savant has him about as dead average as you can be.

Bottom quartile Ks balanced by top quartile BBs, lots of 40-60th percentile entries.

He's an average pitcher in decline with a much better pitcher's deal.

Nothing wrong with him eating innings but not at that price.

Still don't get where the decline is right now. Aside from 2020 he has basically been the same pitcher for five years.
 
Of pitchers that have thrown at least 100 innings this year Bumgarner is 46th is fWar/inning.

So the guy is clearly producing at a mid rotation rate.

Not even sure what the debate is about it honestly.
 
Aside from the thing you don't want to talk about he's been mostly average.

The FIP and ERA are trending down.

FIP last five years:

3.95
3.99
3.90
7.18
4.06

I can't imagine why I think talking about 2020 is useless. But if you want to take an outlier that we have a more recent data point showing how true of an outlier it is as some form of reason why you don't want him then fine.

Its just not a great way of looking at if if you ask me.
 
Of pitchers that have thrown at least 100 innings this year Bumgarner is 46th is fWar/inning.

So the guy is clearly producing at a mid rotation rate.

Not even sure what the debate is about it honestly.

It's about paying 23m/23m/14m to an average pitcher in decline.
 
I think you can peg him for a 1-2 war for the next 3 years.

So anywhere from 30-60 million value.

Lets say in your scenario we get 25M (I don't think we need to ask that much). Thats 26M (51-25) so he is either at his right value or you throw in a 40-45FV prospect? I'd only ask to 14-19 back so we give up less. We have the money.

I think its worth it. He would be dependable middle of the rotation starter to complement our guys who are better than that.

Makes a bunch of sense to me.

30-60 million is a pretty wide range of value.and that's before his contract is taken into consideration. You want to assume we take on roughly 40 million of that remaining salary. So he'd have maintain a roughly a 2 WAR/per season pace over the next 3 years. For an aging pitcher they has durability concerns, that's just not very likely. Why in the world would we take on that sort of risk?

If you want a risky pitcher with upside, sign Snydergaard in the off-season on a 1 year prove it deal.

Or Kluber. Or Greinke. Or Verlander. Or Davies. Or trade for the last remaining year of David Price. There's countless ways to get a 2-3 WAR pitcher that come with significantly less financial risk than MadBum.
 
You don't think his fluke injuries had to do with those sub 200IP seasons?

Come on man - Guy is clearly still a 180-200 IP almost guaranteed.

He would produce what his contract is worth and he will do that over the span of the deal. If a guy like Smyly is worth it at 11 then Bumgarner is WELL WORTH IT at 17.

Bum has been worth $17 one time since 2016.

You can want Bum without wanting the contract. You don’t need to do the mental gymnastics to make your general point that he could be a good fit to fill the Smyly role.
 
Bum has been worth $17 one time since 2016.

You can want Bum without wanting the contract. You don’t need to do the mental gymnastics to make your general point that he could be a good fit to fill the Smyly role.

Are you not including 2016? 2016/2019 he was worth his money and I think you can easily make the argument he is worth it this year.

I don't want to pay his full contract unless the D-Backs are open to sending us a 45-50FV prospect.
 
30-60 million is a pretty wide range of value.and that's before his contract is taken into consideration. You want to assume we take on roughly 40 million of that remaining salary. So he'd have maintain a roughly a 2 WAR/per season pace over the next 3 years. For an aging pitcher they has durability concerns, that's just not very likely. Why in the world would we take on that sort of risk?

If you want a risky pitcher with upside, sign Snydergaard in the off-season on a 1 year prove it deal.

Or Kluber. Or Greinke. Or Verlander. Or Davies. Or trade for the last remaining year of David Price. There's countless ways to get a 2-3 WAR pitcher that come with significantly less financial risk than MadBum.

Guys like Syndergard & Kluber are far more dangerous from my perspective. Those guys arms are ready to blow up. Might be the same with Verlander and his age.

I'm just throwing a range out there that includes the upper and lower bounds. I could be convinced he is worth anywhere from 30-60 million the next 3 years. I'm sure most would have him around 30-40.
 
FIP last five years:

3.95
3.99
3.90
7.18
4.06

I can't imagine why I think talking about 2020 is useless. But if you want to take an outlier that we have a more recent data point showing how true of an outlier it is as some form of reason why you don't want him then fine.

Its just not a great way of looking at if if you ask me.

Also, Look at his ERA, xERA, xFIP.

4.06 > 3.90
 
Back
Top